This paper provides a demonstration of how design for six sigma (DFSS) is utilized to design and engineer a new product. At the center of DFSS approach, is a five-step process, DMADV which is an acronym - define, measure, analyze, design, and verify. We find that when the product is clearly identified in the Define stage, rest of the DMADV application proceeds in sequential and rational manner. However, if we find that if the product is not clearly defined in the define stage, the rest of DMADV application proceeds in recursive and reflective manner. Over time, as DMADV approach is applied, the rate of progress dramatically decreases and the speed of product development becomes painfully slow, which was at times a very frustrating experience for the developer. We provide additional insights for implementing the DFSS approach to develop new products, which is important for both practicing managers and academicians. Most importantly, we conclude that DFSS appears to work well in new product development projects for evolutionary or derivative products, but not so well for revolutionary or breakthrough product projects.
[1]
R. Stake.
Qualitative Case Studies.
,
2005
.
[2]
R. Rajagopalan,et al.
Developing Novel Catalysts with Six Sigma
,
2004
.
[3]
Albert Johnson.
Lessons Learned from Six Sigma in R&D
,
2006
.
[4]
Jiju Antony,et al.
Design for six sigma: a breakthrough business improvement strategy for achieving competitive advantage
,
2002
.
[5]
Jack R. Meredith,et al.
Building operations management theory through case and field research
,
1998
.
[6]
K. Clark,et al.
Creating project plans to focus product development.
,
1992,
Harvard business review.
[7]
John Lewis,et al.
Design for six sigma: 15 lessons learned
,
2002
.
[8]
Nathan R. Soderborg,et al.
Design for Six Sigma at Ford
,
2004
.
[9]
R. Rajagopalan,et al.
Managers at Work: Developing Novel Catalysts with Six Sigma
,
2004
.
[10]
M. Hammer,et al.
Process Management and the future of six sigma
,
2002,
IEEE Engineering Management Review.