Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone

A range of solar radiation management (SRM) techniques has been proposed to counter anthropogenic climate change. Here, we examine the potential effects of stratospheric sulfate aerosols and solar insolation reduction on tropospheric ozone and ozone at Earth’s surface. Ozone is a key air pollutant, which can produce respiratory diseases and crop damage. Using a version of the Community Earth System Model from the National Center for Atmospheric Research that includes comprehensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, we model both stratospheric sulfur injection and solar irradiance reduction schemes, with the aim of achieving equal levels of surface cooling relative to the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 scenario. This allows us to compare the impacts of sulfate aerosols and solar dimming on atmospheric ozone concentrations. Despite nearly identical global mean surface temperatures for the two SRM approaches, solar insolation reduction increases global average surface ozone concentrations, while sulfate injection decreases it. A fundamental difference between the two geoengineering schemes is the importance of heterogeneous reactions in the photochemical ozone balance with larger stratospheric sulfate abundance, resulting in increased ozone depletion in midand high latitudes. This reduces the net transport of stratospheric ozone into the troposphere and thus is a key driver of the overall decrease in surface ozone. At the same time, the change in stratospheric ozone alters the tropospheric photochemical environment due to enhanced ultraviolet radiation. A shared factor among both SRM scenarios is decreased chemical ozone loss due to reduced tropospheric humidity. Under insolation reduction, this is the dominant factor giving rise to the global surface ozone increase. Regionally, both surface ozone increases and decreases are found for both scenarios; that is, SRM would affect regions of the world differently in terms of air pollution. In conclusion, surface ozone and tropospheric chemistry would likely be affected by SRM, but the overall effect is strongly dependent on the SRM scheme. Due to the health and economic impacts of surface ozone, all these impacts should be taken into account in evaluations of possible consequences of SRM.

[1]  R. Neely,et al.  Representation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) CAM4-chem within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2016 .

[2]  S. Flint,et al.  Solar ultraviolet radiation and ozone depletion-driven climate change: effects on terrestrial ecosystems , 2014, Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences.

[3]  Gerhard Krinner,et al.  Past and future changes in biogenic volatile organic compound emissions simulated with a global dynamic vegetation model , 2005 .

[4]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Simulated effects of changes in direct and diffuse radiation on canopy scale isoprene emissions from vegetation following volcanic eruptions , 2011 .

[5]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone , 2009 .

[6]  M. Ashmore Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation , 2005 .

[7]  Oliver Wild,et al.  Modelling the global tropospheric ozone budget: exploring the variability in current models , 2007 .

[8]  Denise L. Mauzerall,et al.  PROTECTING AGRICULTURAL CROPS FROM THE EFFECTS OF TROPOSPHERIC OZONE EXPOSURE: Reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia , 2001 .

[9]  Tropospheric ozone decrease due to the Mount Pinatubo eruption: Reduced stratospheric influx , 2013 .

[10]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[11]  T. Sharkey,et al.  ISOPRENE EMISSION FROM PLANTS. , 2003, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[12]  Simone Tilmes,et al.  The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes , 2008, Science.

[13]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere , 2009 .

[14]  G. Mills,et al.  Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer , 2014 .

[15]  P. Monks Gas‐Phase Radical Chemistry in the Troposphere , 2005 .

[16]  J. Worden,et al.  Tropospheric ozone variations governed by changes in stratospheric circulation , 2014 .

[17]  A. Robock Correction to “Volcanic eruptions and climate” , 2007 .

[18]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone , 2006 .

[19]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[20]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[21]  Q. Fu,et al.  Changes in various branches of the Brewer–Dobson circulation from an ensemble of chemistry climate models , 2013 .

[22]  Caspar M. Ammann,et al.  Climate engineering through artificial enhancement of natural forcings: Magnitudes and implied consequences , 2010 .

[23]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Distribution and Trends of Tropospheric Ozone: An Observation-Based Review , 2014 .

[24]  Ryan R. Neely,et al.  Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate , 2016 .

[25]  Hauke Schmidt,et al.  Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle , 2013 .

[26]  S. Sherwood,et al.  A Matter of Humidity , 2009, Science.

[27]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[28]  V. Aquila,et al.  Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2014 .

[29]  Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone , 2017 .

[30]  L. Polvani,et al.  Reduction of Climate Sensitivity to Solar Forcing due to Stratospheric Ozone Feedback , 2016 .

[31]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[32]  Peter Braesicke,et al.  On the role of ozone feedback in the ENSO amplitude response under global warming , 2017, Geophysical research letters.

[33]  Annette Osprey,et al.  A large ozone-circulation feedback and its implications for global warming assessments , 2014, Nature climate change.

[34]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) , 2009 .

[35]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  Impact of very short-lived halogens on stratospheric ozone abundance and UV radiation in a geo-engineered atmosphere , 2012 .

[36]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud , 2011 .

[37]  J. Lamarque,et al.  CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model , 2012 .

[38]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[39]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Richard G. Derwent,et al.  Effect of stratosphere‐troposphere exchange on the future tropospheric ozone trend , 2003 .

[41]  B. Soden,et al.  An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models , 2006 .

[42]  M. Mills,et al.  Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO2 Injections , 2017 .

[43]  R. Garcia,et al.  Acceleration of the Brewer–Dobson Circulation due to Increases in Greenhouse Gases , 2008 .

[44]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[45]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Technical Note: Ozonesonde climatology between 1995 and 2011: description, evaluation and applications , 2012 .

[46]  T. Shepherd,et al.  A Robust Mechanism for Strengthening of the Brewer–Dobson Circulation in Response to Climate Change: Critical-Layer Control of Subtropical Wave Breaking , 2011 .

[47]  R. Vingarzan A review of surface ozone background levels and trends , 2004 .

[48]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[49]  R. Allan,et al.  Contrasting fast precipitation responses to tropospheric and stratospheric ozone forcing , 2016 .

[50]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. , 2012, Annual review of plant biology.

[51]  E. Highwood,et al.  Weakened tropical circulation and reduced precipitation in response to geoengineering , 2014 .

[52]  P. Hess,et al.  Modelling future changes in surface ozone: a parameterized approach , 2011 .

[53]  L. Oman,et al.  The Response of Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide to the Eruption of Mt. Pinatubo , 2012 .

[54]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change , 2013 .

[55]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Impact of biogenic very short-lived bromine on the Antarctic ozone hole during the 21st century , 2016 .

[56]  L. Grothaus,et al.  Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[57]  L. Emmons,et al.  The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions , 2012 .

[58]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[59]  Andrea Stenke,et al.  Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .

[60]  R. Garcia,et al.  Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in the polar regions , 1996 .

[61]  T. Diehl,et al.  Sensitivity of chemical tracers to meteorological parameters in the MOZART-3 chemical transport model , 2007 .

[62]  D. Waugh,et al.  AGE OF STRATOSPHERIC AIR: THEORY, OBSERVATIONS, AND MODELS , 2002 .

[63]  G. Pitari,et al.  Impact of Stratospheric Volcanic Aerosols on Age-of-Air and Transport of Long-Lived Species , 2016 .

[64]  P. Nowack,et al.  Stratospheric ozone changes under solar geoengineering: implications for UV exposure and air quality , 2016 .

[65]  L. Folinsbee Human health effects of air pollution. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[66]  M. Mills,et al.  Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict , 2014 .

[67]  Luke D. Oman,et al.  Dispersion of the volcanic sulfate cloud from a Mount Pinatubo–like eruption , 2012 .

[68]  P. Rasch,et al.  An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[69]  Stanley C. Solomon,et al.  Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history , 1999 .

[70]  G. Brasseur,et al.  The response of stratospheric ozone to volcanic eruptions : sensitivity to atmospheric chlorine loading , 1995 .

[71]  P. Crutzen Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[72]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario , 2016 .

[73]  Jean-Francois Lamarque,et al.  A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models , 2014 .

[74]  T. Shepherd,et al.  Large climate-induced changes in ultraviolet index and stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone flux , 2009 .