Evaluating listeners’ attention to and comprehension of serialy interleaved, rate-accelerated speech

In Navy command operations, individual watchstanders must often concurrently monitor two or more channels of spoken communications at a time, which in turn can undermine information awareness and decision performance. Recent basic work on this operational challenge has shown that a virtual auditory display solution, in which competing messages are presented one at a time at faster rates of speech, can achieve large and significant improvements on diminished measures of listening performance observed in concurrent monitoring at normal speaking rates with equivalent materials. In the third of a series of experiments developed to address performance questions the parameters of this framework raise for listeners, dependent measures of attention and comprehension were compared in a two factor design that manipulated how serial turns among four talkers were organized and their rate of speech. Although both factors impacted performance, the resulting measures remained substantially higher than corresponding measures of performance with concurrent talkers in an earlier study.

[1]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  The Multitasking Mind , 2010, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[2]  Christina Wasylyshyn,et al.  Comprehension of Speech Presented at Synthetically Accelerated Rates: Evaluating Training and Practice Effects , 2010 .

[3]  Christina Wasylyshyn,et al.  Facilitating the watchstander's voice communications task in future Navy operations , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[4]  Virginia Best,et al.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Barry Arons,et al.  Techniques, Perception, and Applications of Time-Compressed Speech , 2009 .

[6]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[7]  N. Taatgen,et al.  The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  W. D. Garvey The intelligibility of speeded speech. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Evaluating Listeners' Attention to and Comprehension of Spatialized Concurrent and Serial Talkers at Normal and a Synthetically Faster Rate of Speech , 2008 .

[11]  S. S. Reich,et al.  Significance of pauses for speech perception , 1980, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[12]  G. S. Kang,et al.  Speech Analysis and Synthesis Based on Pitch-Synchronous Segmentation of the Speech Waveform. , 1994 .

[13]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[14]  D. Kieras,et al.  Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? , 2000 .

[15]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .

[16]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption , 2009, CHI.

[18]  James M. Royer,et al.  A Sentence Verification Technique for Measuring Reading Comprehension1 , 1979 .

[19]  B. Shinn-Cunningham Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults , 2003 .