This essay introduces and examines the impact of the Second Sophistic in the Near East on the history of rhetoric. Although the overall impact of sophists is apparent as early as the Classical Period of ancient Greece, this work emphasizes the renaissance of sophistic rhetoric during the so-called Second Sophistic, a movement that flourished slightly before and throughout the Roman Empire. The Second Sophistic provided an educational system that proved to be a major force spreading the study and performance of rhetoric throughout the Roman Empire. This essay examines and synthesizes scholarship that employs conventional historical approaches, particularly research that often focuses on individual sophists, in order to establish a grounding (and justification) for concentrating on what is termed here as a “site-perspective.” That is, this essay stresses the importance of the sites of sophistic education and performance, arguing for such an orientation for future research. This essay also advances observations from the author’s own experiences and research at ancient sites in Greece and Turkey, as well as other sources of archaeological and epigraphical research. Such work reveals that artifacts at archaeological sites—epigraphy, statuary now held at museums in Greece and Turkey, and a range of other forms of material rhetoric—provide contextual insights into the nature, influence, and longevity of rhetoric during the Second Sophistic beyond examining the achievements of individual sophists. A site-perspective approach reveals that a symbiotic relationship existed between the educational achievements of the Second Sophistic—in which rhetoric played a major role—and the social and cultural complexities of the Roman Empire. Such observations also reveal the benefits, but also the need, for further fieldwork, archival research, and the development of new methodological procedures to provide a more refined understanding of the impact of the Second Sophistic on the history of rhetoric.
[1]
P. Thonemann,et al.
Teos and Abdera
,
2022
.
[2]
The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian
,
2021
.
[3]
Rhetoric, the Dorian Hexapolis, and Knidos: A Study of the Reception of Ancient Rhetoric in the Greek East and Its Impact on the Second Sophistic
,
2021,
Brill's Companion to the Reception of Ancient Rhetoric.
[4]
Laura Viidebaum.
Creating the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition
,
2021
.
[5]
Keith Lloyd.
The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics
,
2020
.
[6]
Christopher Moore.
Calling Philosophers Names
,
2019,
The Philosophers' Magazine.
[7]
R. Enos,et al.
Writing Instruction for the “Young Ladies” of Teos: A Note on Women and Literacy in Antiquity
,
2014
.
[8]
R. Cribiore.
Libanius the Sophist: Rhetoric, Reality, and Religion in the Fourth Century
,
2013
.
[9]
T. Benson,et al.
The Genuine Teachers of This Art
,
2012
.
[10]
Andrea A. Lunsford,et al.
SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies
,
2009
.
[11]
R. Enos.
Speaking of Cicero. . . and His Mother: A Research Note on an Ancient Greek Inscription and the Study of Classical Rhetoric
,
2005
.
[12]
J. Poulakos.
Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece
,
1995
.
[13]
R. Enos.
Why Gorgias of Leontini traveled to Athens: A study of recent epigraphical evidence 1
,
1992
.
[14]
E. Schiappa.
Did Plato Coin Rhetorike
,
1990
.
[15]
I. Avotins.
The Holders of the Chairs of Rhetoric at Athens
,
1975
.
[16]
R. Smith.
The art of rhetoric in Alexandria
,
1974
.
[17]
L. Bitzer.
The Rhetorical Situation.
,
1968
.
[18]
S. Papaioannou,et al.
Brill's Companion to the Reception of Ancient Rhetoric
,
2022
.