E-Research Collaboration in Academia and Industry

E-Collaboration has come of age in the last decade, with industry and academia using the latest web-based collaborative software to bring together groups of workers to work on common tasks. Research is a $370 billion industry in the United States and is conducted in every sector of the economy. It has collaboration at its core. Most innovations result from collaborative efforts between groups of workers who are often geographically dispersed. Academic leaders now seek the synergies that result from collaboration between their research faculty and others. Web 2.0-based research portals have emerged that allow knowledge sharing and lowering of social barriers between researchers. Another important development is cloud computing, which has dramatically reduced computing costs for organizations. These tools allow researchers in both industry and academia to extend their range and reach, gain synergies between dispersed groups, and increase research efficiency and effectiveness. This paper examines the use of e-research collaboration tools in industry and academia. It describes a framework that matches an organization's e-research collaboration needs to e-research collaboration solutions across several critical dimensions. The proposed framework will help to improve the understanding of available options for e-collaboration infrastructures, particularly in the sub-area of e-research. It will also help to identify the fit between these infrastructures and organizational e-research collaboration needs.

[1]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Doug Vogel,et al.  e-collaboration: the reality of virtuality , 2002 .

[3]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline , 2005, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Cong Wang,et al.  Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage services , 2010, IEEE Network.

[5]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms , 2010, CACM.

[6]  Brian Hayes,et al.  What Is Cloud Computing? , 2019, Cloud Technologies.

[7]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Survival of the leanest: intensive knowledge work and groupware adaptation , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  Yu. G. Smetanin,et al.  A review of cloud computing , 2011, Scientific and Technical Information Processing.

[9]  Regina Hess,et al.  Facilitators and barriers involved in conducting hospital-based research across multiple sites , 2008 .

[10]  Bay Arinze,et al.  Creation of Social Capital in a Web Based Virtual Research Environment , 2010 .

[11]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Face-to-Face: Making Network Organizations Work , 1992 .

[12]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Effective Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[13]  Alexandra DeFelice Cloud Computing: What Accountants Need to Know , 2010 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[15]  Murugan Anandarajan,et al.  An Overview of e-Research Collaboration , 2010 .

[16]  Eve D. Rosenzweig A contingent view of e-collaboration and performance in manufacturing , 2009 .

[17]  Paul Hofmann,et al.  Cloud computing and electricity , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Pietro Gambadauro,et al.  Office 2.0: a web 2.0 tool for international collaborative research , 2008, The Lancet.

[19]  Efraim Turban,et al.  A Framework for Adopting Collaboration 2.0 Tools for Virtual Group Decision Making , 2011 .

[20]  B.E. Munkvold,et al.  Experiences From Global E-Collaboration: ContextualInfluences on Technology Adoption and Use , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[21]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[22]  Penelope Hawe,et al.  Understanding Interdisciplinary Collaborations as Social Networks , 2011, American journal of community psychology.

[23]  Julianne Cheek,et al.  Researching Collaboratively: Implications for Qualitative Research and Researchers , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[24]  Roger Nevin,et al.  Supporting 21st Century Learning through Google Apps. , 2009 .

[25]  Biswajit Thakur,et al.  Web Enabled Design Collaboration in India , 2011, Int. J. e Collab..

[26]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Metcalfe's law, Web 2.0, and the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[27]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[28]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Steven Cherry,et al.  Forecast for Cloud Computing: Up, Up, and Away , 2009, IEEE Spectrum.

[30]  Andrea Rinaldi Science wikinomics , 2009, EMBO reports.

[31]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Integration of E-Collaboration Technologies: research Opportunities and Challenges , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[32]  Panagiotis Louridas Up in the Air: Moving Your Applications to the Cloud , 2010, IEEE Software.

[33]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[34]  N. Mauthner,et al.  `Knowledge Once Divided Can Be Hard to Put Together Again' , 2008 .

[35]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Government Funding of E-collaboration Research in the European Union: A Comparison with the United States Model , 2007, Int. J. e Collab..

[36]  Kjetil Kristensen,et al.  Collaborative Performance: Addressing the ROI of Collaboration , 2010, Int. J. e Collab..

[37]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Adaptations that Virtual Teams Make so that Complex Tasks Can Be Performed Using Simple E-Collaboration Technologies , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[38]  Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz,et al.  An investigation of team information processing in service teams: Exploring the link between teams and customers , 2003 .

[39]  N. Kock,et al.  Expanding the Boundaries of E-Collaboration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[40]  Steven Cherry,et al.  Corporate Travel Down, Telecommuting Up , 2009, IEEE Spectrum.

[41]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.