Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND Several diagnostic strategies using ultrasound imaging, measurement of D-dimer, and assessment of clinical probability of disease have proved safe in patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis, but they have not been compared in randomized trials. METHODS Outpatients presenting with suspected lower-extremity deep-vein thrombosis were potentially eligible. Using a clinical model, physicians evaluated the patients and categorized them as likely or unlikely to have deep-vein thrombosis. The patients were then randomly assigned to undergo ultrasound imaging alone (control group) or to undergo D-dimer testing (D-dimer group) followed by ultrasound imaging unless the D-dimer test was negative and the patient was considered clinically unlikely to have deep-vein thrombosis, in which case ultrasound imaging was not performed. RESULTS Five hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned to the control group, and 566 to the D-dimer group. The overall prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was 15.7 percent. Among patients for whom deep-vein thrombosis had been ruled out by the initial diagnostic strategy, there were two confirmed venous thromboembolic events in the D-dimer group (0.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.5 percent) and six events in the control group (1.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 2.9 percent; P=0.16) during three months of follow-up. The use of D-dimer testing resulted in a significant reduction in the use of ultrasonography, from a mean of 1.34 tests per patient in the control group to 0.78 in the D-dimer group (P=0.008). Two hundred eighteen patients (39 percent) in the D-dimer group did not require ultrasound imaging. CONCLUSIONS Deep-vein thrombosis can be ruled out in a patient who is judged clinically unlikely to have deep-vein thrombosis and who has a negative D-dimer test. Ultrasound testing can be safely omitted in such patients.

[1]  P. Investigators,et al.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). , 1990, JAMA.

[2]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Combination of a clinical risk assessment score and rapid whole blood D-dimer testing in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  M. Kovacs,et al.  A latex D-dimer reliably excludes venous thromboembolism. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  J Thrall,et al.  Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part I. Data collection and tabulation. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D. Slosman,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients , 1999, The Lancet.

[6]  N. Grenier,et al.  D-dimer Strategy in Thrombosis Exclusion , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[7]  L F Burmeister,et al.  Proving the Null Hypothesis , 1992, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[8]  B. Satiani,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. , 1991, American family physician.

[9]  J Bormanis,et al.  Management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department: combining use of a clinical diagnosis model with D-dimer testing. , 2000, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  J Bormanis,et al.  Application of a Diagnostic Clinical Model for the Management of Hospitalized Patients with Suspected Deep-vein Thrombosis , 1999, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  W C Blackwelder,et al.  "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.

[13]  P. Brill-Edwards,et al.  D-Dimer Testing in the Diagnosis of Acute Venous Thromboembolism , 1999, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[14]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  M. Sluzewski,et al.  Influence of negative ultrasound findings on the management of in- and outpatients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. , 1991, European journal of radiology.

[16]  D. Anderson,et al.  SimpliRED D-dimer can reduce the diagnostic tests in suspected deep vein thrombosis , 1998, The Lancet.

[17]  C. del Rio,et al.  Diagnostic value of d‐dimer in patients with a moderate pretest probability of deep venous thrombosis , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[18]  J. Bartko,et al.  Proving the null hypothesis. , 1991 .

[19]  P. Wells,et al.  A comparison of three rapid D‐dimer methods for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[20]  H. Büller,et al.  A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  N. Ashford,et al.  Use of a simplified clinical scoring system and d‐dimer testing can reduce the requirement for radiology in the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis by over 20% , 2001, British journal of haematology.

[22]  H. Büller,et al.  Diagnosis of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. , 1995, Haemostasis.

[23]  Janis Bormanis,et al.  Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management , 1997, The Lancet.

[24]  J. Douketis,et al.  A novel and rapid whole-blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. , 1995, Circulation.

[25]  J. Douketis,et al.  Management of Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis in Outpatients by Using Clinical Assessment and d-dimer Testing , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.