Computer aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging

_____________________________________________________________________________________ A novel automated computerized scheme has been developed for determining a likelihood measure of ma­ lignancy for cancer suspicious regions in the prostate based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) images. Our database consisted of 34 consecutive patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma in the peripheral zone of the prostate. Both carcinoma and non-malignant tissue were annotated in consensus on MR images by a radiologist and a researcher using whole mount step-section histopathology as standard of reference. The annotations were used as regions of interest (ROI). A feature set comprising pharmacokinetic parameters and a T1 estimate was extracted from the ROIs to train a support vector machine as classifier. The output of the classifier was used as a measure of likelihood of malignancy. Diagnostic performance of the scheme was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve. The diagnostic accuracy obtained for differentiating prostate cancer from non-malignant disorders in the pe­ ripheral zone was 0.83 (0.75-0.92). This suggests that it is feasible to develop a CAD system capable of characterizing prostate cancer in the peripheral zone based on DCE-MRI. Computerized analysis o f prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using DCE-MRI 11

[1]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[2]  François Cornud,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2‐weighted, dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2011, BJU international.

[3]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[4]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Automatic computer aided detection of abnormalities in multi-parametric prostate MRI , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[5]  S. Verma,et al.  Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Katsuyuki Nakanishi,et al.  Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: Can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  P. Box Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer , 2011 .

[8]  Fritz H Schröder,et al.  Prostate cancer around the world. An overview. , 2010, Urologic oncology.

[9]  R. Beyth,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  Nicholas Petrick,et al.  CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[12]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and staging. , 2010, World journal of radiology.

[13]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. , 2010, Radiology.

[14]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[19]  Peter Vock,et al.  Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers , 2009, European Radiology.

[20]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[21]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Prostate cancer mortality reduction by prostate-specific antigen-based screening adjusted for nonattendance and contamination in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). , 2009, European urology.

[22]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with multi‐parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  B. Czerniak,et al.  Prostate cancer of transition zone origin lacks TMPRSS2–ERG gene fusion , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[25]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Integrating structural and functional imaging for computer assisted detection of prostate cancer on multi-protocol in vivo 3 Tesla MRI , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Kyung Ah Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  Henkjan Huisman,et al.  [Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer screening]. , 2009, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[28]  C Beigelman-Aubry,et al.  [Evaluation of a computer aided detection system for lung nodules with ground glass opacity component on multidetector-row CT]. , 2009, Journal de radiologie.

[29]  Olivier Colot,et al.  Combining a deformable model and a probabilistic framework for an automatic 3D segmentation of prostate on MRI , 2009, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[30]  Swatee Singh Computer Aided Detection of Masses in Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging Using Information Theory Principles , 2008 .

[31]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Comprehensive Segmentation, Registration, and Cancer Detection Scheme on 3 Tesla In VivoProstate DCE-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[32]  Katsuyoshi Ito,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Therese Miller,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  Peter F. Sharp,et al.  Evaluation of a System for Automatic Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy From Color Fundus Photographs in a Large Population of Patients With Diabetes , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[35]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[36]  Pieter C. Vos,et al.  Combining T2-weighted with dynamic MR images for computerized classification of prostate lesions , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[37]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[38]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  MR‐guided prostate interventions , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  J. N. Shah Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps: Can It Improve Sensitivity of Less-Experienced Readers? Preliminary Findings , 2008 .

[40]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  3D delineation of prostate, rectum and bladder on MR images , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[41]  H. Hricak,et al.  Assessment of biologic aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of MR signal intensity with Gleason grade after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Radiology.

[42]  Josien P. W. Pluim,et al.  Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Nonrigid Medical Image Registration Using Mutual Information and B-Splines , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[43]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Bladder and Prostate Using Coupled 3D Deformable Models , 2007, MICCAI.

[44]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[45]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Chestwall Segmentation in 3D Breast Ultrasound Using a Deformable Volume Model , 2007, IPMI.

[47]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[48]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Automatic segmentation of pelvic structures from magnetic resonance images for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[49]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2007, Radiology.

[50]  Pieter C. Vos,et al.  Effect of calibration on computerized analysis of prostate lesions using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[51]  A. Graser,et al.  Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system , 2007, European Radiology.

[52]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[53]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[54]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[55]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[56]  Oscar Camara,et al.  Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[57]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[58]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[59]  Silvia D. Chang,et al.  Combined diffusion‐weighted and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis—Correlation with biopsy and histopathology , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[60]  C. Kim,et al.  Localization of Prostate Cancer Using 3T MRI: Comparison of T2-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[61]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[62]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. , 2005, Radiology.

[63]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computer-aided detection of lung nodules: false positive reduction using a 3D gradient field method and 3D ellipsoid fitting. , 2005, Medical physics.

[64]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer: precision of integrating functional MR imaging with radiation therapy treatment by using fiducial gold markers. , 2005, Radiology.

[65]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Variability in the Description of Morphologic and Contrast Enhancement Characteristics of Breast Lesions onMagnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[66]  Vladimir Bilim,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.

[67]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  G. Parker,et al.  Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging--initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[69]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Mutual information in coupled multi-shape model for medical image segmentation , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[70]  Frank J Rybicki,et al.  Comments on T2 measurements of prostate tissue. , 2004, Radiology.

[71]  Graham Wright,et al.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[72]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI , 2004, European Radiology.

[73]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of lung nodules: false positive reduction using a 3D gradient field method , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[74]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Parametric shape modeling using deformable superellipses for prostate segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[75]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. , 2004, Radiology.

[76]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[77]  David J Collins,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion. Approaches and biomedical challenges. , 2004, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[78]  D. Mcleod Success and failure of single-modality treatment for early prostate cancer. , 2004, Reviews in urology.

[79]  E. Crawford,et al.  Epidemiology of prostate cancer. , 2003, Urology.

[80]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A comparison of methods for mammogram registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[81]  Henkjan J Huisman,et al.  Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[82]  Qiang Li,et al.  Selective enhancement filters for nodules, vessels, and airway walls in two- and three-dimensional CT scans. , 2003, Medical physics.

[83]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[84]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[85]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[86]  M. Laeeq Khan,et al.  Partin tables: past and present , 2003, BJU international.

[87]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[88]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[89]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. , 2003, Radiology.

[90]  K. Doi,et al.  Computerized scheme for determination of the likelihood measure of malignancy for pulmonary nodules on low-dose CT images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[91]  A. Padhani MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[92]  M. Kattan,et al.  Comparisons of nomograms and urologists' predictions in prostate cancer. , 2002, Seminars in urologic oncology.

[93]  A. Padhani,et al.  Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[94]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion‐weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[95]  C C Ling,et al.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[96]  T. Stamey,et al.  Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[97]  M. Roobol,et al.  Tumor characteristics in screening for prostate cancer with and without rectal examination as an initial screening test at low PSA (0.0–3.9 ng/ml) , 2001, The Prostate.

[98]  H. Huisman,et al.  Accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic contrast‐enhanced dynamic MRI parameters of the prostate , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[99]  C. Brendler,et al.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent atypia is associated with a higher incidence of cancer on subsequent needle biopsy than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia alone. , 2001, Urology.

[100]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  A Survey Of Free-Form Object Representation and Recognition Techniques , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[101]  K. Taari,et al.  Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[102]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[103]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. , 2000, Medical physics.

[104]  C. Rutter,et al.  Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[105]  T. Stamey,et al.  An analysis of 148 consecutive transition zone cancers: clinical and histological characteristics. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[106]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[107]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[108]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: User‐defined versus semi‐automated region‐of‐interest analysis , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[109]  F. Schröder,et al.  Re: Lest we abandon digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[110]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[111]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[112]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[113]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[114]  S. Delorme,et al.  Non-invasive vascular imaging: assessing tumour vascularity , 1998, European Radiology.

[115]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[116]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[117]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[118]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[119]  E. Crawford,et al.  Serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination for early detection of prostate cancer in a national community-based program. The Prostate Cancer Education Council. , 1996, Urology.

[120]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[121]  P. Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. , 1996, Radiology.

[122]  B R Rosen,et al.  Dynamic Gd‐DTPA enhanced MRI measurement of tissue cell volume fraction , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[123]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. , 1995, Radiology.

[124]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[125]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[126]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[127]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[128]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[129]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1993, Radiology.

[130]  C. Tempany,et al.  Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[131]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[132]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[133]  H. Waxman,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis , 1990, The Lancet.

[134]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[135]  L Axel,et al.  Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. , 1989, Radiology.

[136]  J. Friedman Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[137]  H Y Kressel,et al.  Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. , 1988, Radiology.

[138]  H. Weinmann,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. , 1984, Physiological chemistry and physics and medical NMR.

[139]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[140]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[141]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .