Comparison study on AIS data of ship traffic behavior

Abstract AIS (Automatic Identification System) data provides valuable input parameters in ship traffic simulation models for maritime risk analysis and the prevention of shipping accidents. This article reports on the detailed comparisons of AIS data analysis between a Dutch case and a Chinese case. This analysis focuses on restricted waterways to support inland waterway simulations, comparing the differences between a narrow waterway in the Netherlands (the Port of Rotterdam) and a wide one in China (wide waterway of Yangtze River close to the Su-Tong Bridge). It is shown that straightforward statistical distributions can be used to characterize lateral position, speed, heading and interval times for different types and sizes of ships. However, the distributions for different characteristics of ship behaviors differ significantly.

[1]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[2]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Abdellatif Benabdelhafid,et al.  Assessing Safety of Ferry Routes by Ship Handling Model through AHP and Fuzzy Approach , 2012 .

[4]  A. Harati-Mokhtari,et al.  Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[5]  W C Webster,et al.  SHIPHANDLING SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO WATERWAY DESIGN , 1992 .

[6]  Ben Ale,et al.  Nautical traffic simulation with multi-agent system for safety , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[7]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Marine traffic risk modelling – an innovative approach and a case study , 2011 .

[8]  Qiang Meng,et al.  An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Probability modelling of vessel collisions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Maria Isabel Ribeiro Obstacle Avoidance , 2005 .

[11]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Klaus D. McDonald-Maier,et al.  Autonomous Ship Collision Avoidance Navigation Concepts, Technologies and Techniques , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[15]  M. Łącki Neuroevolutionary Ship Handling System in a Windy Environment , 2012 .

[16]  P. V. Davis,et al.  A Computer Simulation of Marine Traffic Using Domains and Arenas , 1980, Journal of Navigation.

[17]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Artificial force fields for multi-agent simulations of maritime traffic and risk estimation , 2012 .

[18]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data , 2010 .