Comparison of Glyphosate Salts (Isopropylamine, Diammonium, and Potassium) and Calcium and Magnesium Concentrations on the Control of Various Weeds1

Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted near Knoxville, TN, during 2002 and 2003 to investigate the effects of calcium and magnesium ions on the performance of three glyphosate formulations with and without diammonium sulfate (AMS). Weed species investigated in the greenhouse were broadleaf signalgrass, pitted morningglory, Palmer amaranth, and yellow nutsedge. Three glyphosate formulations (isopropylamine salt, diammonium salt, and potassium salt) and two glyphosate application rates (0.42 and 0.84 kg ae/ha) were applied to weeds in water fortified with either calcium or magnesium at concentrations of 0, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 ppm. In all comparisons, there were no differences in the three glyphosate formulations. Glyphosate activity was reduced only when cation concentration was >250 ppm, and this antagonism was not observed when 2% w/ w AMS was added to the spray solution. A chemical analysis of the calcium and magnesium concentrations in water collected from farmers indicated that water samples from eight different producers contained relatively low amounts of cations, with calcium at <40 ppm and magnesium at <8 ppm. In the field results using these and other waters as the herbicide carrier, broadleaf signalgrass control was greater with the 0.84 kg ae/ha than 0.42 kg ae/ha glyphosate rate regardless of water source or addition of AMS. Pitted morningglory responded similarly to glyphosate with water from all farms and with AMS added, and the addition of AMS gave similar results for both glyphosate rates. In 2003, common cocklebur was evaluated and control was >93% regardless of glyphosate rate, water source, or AMS addition. Based on these results, the addition of AMS-based adjuvants to many glyphosate applications may not be warranted. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; diammonium sulfate; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla L. #3 BRAPP; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri L. # AMAPA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; soybean, [Glycine Max (L). Merr. var ‘Asgrow 5602’]. Additional index words: Antagonism, hard water. Abbreviations: DAT, days after treatment; ICAP, inductively coupled argon plasma.

[1]  L. Schreiber,et al.  Interactions of calcium ions with weakly acidic active ingredients slow cuticular penetration: a case study with glyphosate. , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[2]  M. Patterson,et al.  Cotton and Weed Response to Glyphosate Applied with Sulfur-Containing Additives1 , 2004, Weed Technology.

[3]  C. Gauvrit Glyphosate Response to Calcium, Ethoxylated Amine Surfactant, and Ammonium Sulfate1 , 2003, Weed Technology.

[4]  D. Pratt,et al.  Substitutes for Ammonium Sulfate as Additives with Glyphosate and Glufosinate1 , 2003, Weed Technology.

[5]  John A. Smith,et al.  Influence of Glyphosate and Glufosinate on Weed Control and Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Yield in Herbicide-Tolerant Sugarbeet1 , 2002, Weed Technology.

[6]  D. Shaw,et al.  Weed Control from Herbicide Combinations with Glyphosate1 , 2002, Weed Technology.

[7]  David L. Jordan,et al.  Influence of Application Variables on Efficacy of Glyphosate , 1997, Weed Technology.

[8]  K. Thelen,et al.  The Basis for the Hard-Water Antagonism of Glyphosate Activity , 1995, Weed Science.

[9]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Optimizing Adjuvants to Overcome Glyphosate Antagonistic Salts , 1993, Weed Technology.

[10]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Influence of diammonium sulfate and other salts on glyphosate phytotoxicity , 1993 .

[11]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Spray Droplet Residual of Glyphosate in Various Carriers , 1992, Weed Science.

[12]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Species Differ in Response to Adjuvants with Glyphosate , 1992, Weed Technology.

[13]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  2,4-D and Salt Combinations Affect Glyphosate Phytotoxicity , 1992, Weed Technology.

[14]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Salt Antagonism of Glyphosate , 1991, Weed Science.

[15]  W. T. Haller,et al.  Interactive effects of diluent pH and calcium content on glyphosate activity on Panicum repens L. (torpedograss) , 1989 .

[16]  S. G. Carmer,et al.  Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs , 1989 .

[17]  R. Glass Metal complex formation by glyphosate , 1984 .

[18]  P. Shea,et al.  Reversal of Cation-Induced Reduction in Glyphosate Activity by EDTA , 1984, Weed Science.

[19]  O. Burnside,et al.  Effect of Water Quality, Carrier Volume, and Acid on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity , 1983, Weed Science.

[20]  O. Burnside,et al.  Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity [Post-emergence herbicides; Nebraska]. , 1983 .

[21]  M. S. McIntosh,et al.  Analysis of Combined Experiments1 , 1983 .

[22]  J. O'donovan,et al.  INFLUENCE OF NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS, AMMONIUM SULPHATE, WATER QUALITY AND SPRAY VOLUME ON THE PHYTOTOXICITY OF GLYPHOSATE , 1981 .

[23]  D. Penner,et al.  Effect of Diluent Volume and Calcium on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity , 1978, Weed Science.