Geodetic Network Design and Optimization on the Active Tuzla Fault (Izmir, Turkey) for Disaster Management

Both seismological and geodynamic research emphasize that the Aegean Region, which comprises the Hellenic Arc, the Greek mainland and Western Turkey is the most seismically active region in Western Eurasia. The convergence of the Eurasian and African lithospheric plates forces a westward motion on the Anatolian plate relative to the Eurasian one. Western Anatolia is a valuable laboratory for Earth Science research because of its complex geological structure. Izmir is a large city in Turkey with a population of about 2.5 million that is at great risk from big earthquakes. Unfortunately, previous geodynamics studies performed in this region are insufficient or cover large areas instead of specific faults. The Tuzla Fault, which is aligned trending NE–SW between the town of Menderes and Cape Doganbey, is an important fault in terms of seismic activity and its proximity to the city of Izmir. This study aims to perform a large scale investigation focusing on the Tuzla Fault and its vicinity for better understanding of the region's tectonics. In order to investigate the crustal deformation along the Tuzla Fault and Izmir Bay, a geodetic network has been designed and optimizations were performed. This paper suggests a schedule for a crustal deformation monitoring study which includes research on the tectonics of the region, network design and optimization strategies, theory and practice of processing. The study is also open for extension in terms of monitoring different types of fault characteristics. A one-dimensional fault model with two parameters – standard strike-slip model of dislocation theory in an elastic half-space – is formulated in order to determine which sites are suitable for the campaign based geodetic GPS measurements. Geodetic results can be used as a background data for disaster management systems.

[1]  Nuretdin Kaymakçi.  Kinematic development and paleostress analysis of the Denizli Basin (Western Turkey): implications of spatial variation of relative paleostress magnitudes and orientations , 2006 .

[2]  James L. Davis,et al.  GPS APPLICATIONS FOR GEODYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE STUDIES , 1997 .

[3]  Bahadır Aktuğ,et al.  Recent crustal deformation of İzmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field , 2006 .

[4]  K. Feigl,et al.  Coseismic and Postseismic Fault Slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey Earthquake. , 2000, Science.

[5]  E. Demirbaǧ,et al.  Neotectonic structures in İzmir Gulf and surrounding regions (western Turkey): Evidences of strike-slip faulting with compression in the Aegean extensional regime , 2005 .

[6]  Corné Kreemer,et al.  Contemporary kinematics of the southern Aegean and the Mediterranean Ridge , 2004 .

[7]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa‐Arabia‐Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions , 2005 .

[8]  C. Papazachos.  Seismological and GPS evidence for the Aegean‐Anatolia Interaction , 1999 .

[9]  James Jackson,et al.  Active Tectonics of the Aegean Region , 1994 .

[10]  J. Jackson,et al.  A comparison of satellite laser ranging and seismicity data in the Aegean Region , 1994 .

[11]  B. Mitchell,et al.  Seismotectonics of western Turkey from high resolution earthquake relocations and moment tensor determinations , 2006 .

[12]  Erik W. Grafarend,et al.  Optimization of Geodetic Networks , 1974 .

[13]  T. Kato,et al.  On optimal geodetic network design for fault-mechanics studies , 2000 .

[14]  B. Mitchell,et al.  Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia , 2006 .

[15]  D. McKenzie.  Active tectonics of the Alpine—Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions , 1978 .

[16]  James Jackson,et al.  Active tectonics of the north and central Aegean Sea , 1991 .

[17]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus , 2000 .

[18]  Şafak Altunkaynak,et al.  The Çubukludağ graben, south of İzmir: its tectonic significance in the Neogene geological evolution of the western Anatolia , 2001 .

[19]  J. Mercier,et al.  Extensional tectonic regimes in the Aegean basins during the Cenozoic , 1989 .

[20]  G. Schmitt,et al.  Optimization of geodetic networks , 1982 .

[21]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Geodetic network optimization for geophysical parameters , 2000 .

[22]  Eric H. Cline,et al.  Poseidon's Horses: Plate Tectonics and Earthquake Storms in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean , 2000 .