Evaluating the Implementation and Active Living Impacts of a State Government Planning Policy Designed to Create Walkable Neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia

Purpose. Evaluate the implementation of a government planning policy (Liveable Neighbourhoods Guidelines) and its impacts on residents' walking behaviors. Design. Cross-sectional study of participants from the RESIDential Environments project (RESIDE). Setting. Nineteen “liveable” and 17 “conventionally designed” housing developments across Perth, Western Australia. Subjects. Five hundred ninety-four participants from RESIDE who resided in 36 housing developments. Measures. Developed in geographic information systems to assess the on-ground implementation of 43 policy requirements. Policy compliance was defined as the degree to which construction of the developments adhered to the standards outlined. Walking behaviors were measured using the Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire. K-means cluster analyses identified groups of homogeneous developments with respect to policy implementation. Analysis. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the likelihood of undertaking any and ≥ 60 minutes of transport and recreational walking associated with (1) policy compliance and (2) different clusters of developments. Results. There were few significant differences in on-ground outcomes between the two development types. Despite incomplete implementation, the odds of walking for transport increased with overall levels of policy compliance (OR= 1.53, 95% CI 1.13–2.08) and compliance with the community design (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.13–1.42), movement network (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.38–4.50), and lot layout elements (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.50). Conclusion. Consistent with the aims of the policy, residents in walkable (i.e., liveable) neighborhoods may be more physically active.

[1]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  A. Khattak,et al.  Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs , 2006 .

[3]  Evaluation of a natural experiment of the impact of a new urban planning code on walking: Longitudinal results from RESIDE , 2015 .

[4]  Fiona Bull,et al.  The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Neighborhood environmental factors correlated with walking near home: Using SPACES. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  C. Basch,et al.  Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case Study , 1985, Health education quarterly.

[7]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Trevor Shilton,et al.  Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE's Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 2006, Preventive medicine.

[9]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[10]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  S. Allender,et al.  ‘Tell us something we don't already know or do!’ — The response of planning and transport professionals to public health guidance on the built environment and physical activity , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[12]  J F Sallis,et al.  Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  J. Schilling,et al.  The public health roots of zoning: in search of active living's legal genealogy. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[15]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[16]  A. Khattak,et al.  Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA , 2005 .

[17]  F. Bull,et al.  A new urban planning code's impact on walking: the residential environments project. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[18]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[19]  A. Bauman,et al.  Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  F. Bull,et al.  Evaluation of the implementation of a state government community design policy aimed at increasing local walking: design issues and baseline results from RESIDE, Perth Western Australia. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[21]  A. Bauman,et al.  Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  Steven Cummins,et al.  Work group IV: Future directions for measures of the food and physical activity environments. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  Evaluating a new urbanist neighborhood , 2011 .

[25]  Sally Casswell,et al.  Formative and Process Evaluation of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs , 1993 .

[26]  David Miller,et al.  FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR MULTIMODAL AREAWIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT , 2004 .