Characterization of host tolerance to Striga hermonthica

SummaryOne of the most promising control options against the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica is the use of crop varieties that combine resistance with high levels of tolerance. The aim of this study was to clarify the relation between Striga infestation level, Striga infection level and relative yield loss of sorghum and to use this insight for exploring the options for a proper screening procedure for tolerance. In three pot experiments, conducted in Mali (2003) and The Netherlands (2003, 2004), four sorghum genotypes were exposed to a range of Striga infestation levels, ranging from 0.0625 to 16 seeds cm−3. Observations included regular Striga emergence counts and sorghum grain yield at maturity.There were significant genotype, infestation and genotype × infestation effects on sorghum yield. The relation between infestation level and infection level was density dependent. Furthermore, the relation between Striga infection level and relative yield loss was non-linear, though for the most resistant genotype Framida only the linear part of the relation was obtained, as even at high infestation levels only moderate infection levels were achieved. The results suggest that for resistant genotypes, tolerance can best be quantified as a reduced relative yield loss per aboveground Striga plant, whereas for less resistant genotypes the maximum relative yield loss can best be used. Whether both expressions of tolerance are interrelated could not be resolved. Complications of screening for tolerance under field conditions are discussed.

[1]  M. Smith,et al.  Estimation of the seedbank of Striga spp. (Scrophulariaceae) in Malian fields and the implications for a model of biocontrol of Striga hermonthica , 1996 .

[2]  B. Reddy,et al.  Quantitative-genetic parameters of sorghum growth under striga infestation in Mali and Kenya , 2001 .

[3]  S. Gupta,et al.  Pennisetum glaucum subsp. monodii accessions with Striga resistance in West Africa , 2004 .

[4]  M. Arnaud,et al.  Physiology and histology of resistance to Striga hermonthica in Sorghum bicolor var. Framida , 1999 .

[5]  S. K. Kim.  Genetics of Maize Tolerance of Striga hermonthica , 1994 .

[6]  C. R. Riches,et al.  Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control , 1993 .

[7]  Y. Efron.  Screening Maize for Tolerance to Striga hermonthica , 1993 .

[8]  S. K. Kim,et al.  Expression of mature plant resistance to Striga hermonthica in maize , 2000, Euphytica.

[9]  M. Press,et al.  The parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica can reduce photosynthesis of its sorghum and maize hosts in the field , 1995 .

[10]  S. K. Kim,et al.  Yield losses in maize due to Striga hermonthica in West and Central Africa , 2002 .

[11]  F. F. Bebawi,et al.  Germination, Host Preference, and Phenolic Content of Witchweed (Striga hermonthica) Seed Populations , 1986, Weed Science.

[12]  M. Kropff,et al.  A comparative study on Striga hermonthica interaction with a sensitive and a tolerant sorghum cultivar , 2000 .

[13]  F. F. Bebawi.  Intraspecific Physiological Variants of Striga hermonthica , 1981, Experimental Agriculture.

[14]  V. Salonen,et al.  RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE IN A HOST PLANT‐HOLOPARASITIC PLANT INTERACTION: GENETIC VARIATION AND COSTS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  M. Press,et al.  Xenognosin production and tolerance to Striga asiatica infection of high-yielding maize cultivars , 2003 .

[16]  B. Reddy,et al.  Utility of indirect and direct selection traits for improving Striga resistance in two sorghum recombinant inbred populations , 2004 .

[17]  S. K. Kim,et al.  An alternative method of screening maize for tolerance to Striga , 2000 .

[18]  F. F. Bebawi,et al.  The Dispersion of Backpack-Applied Ethylene in Soil , 1985, Weed Science.

[19]  K. Ramaiah,et al.  Striga and other weeds in sorghum. , 1982 .

[20]  J. Wilson,et al.  Resistance to Striga hermonthica in Wild Accessions of the Primary Gene Pool of Pennisetum glaucum. , 2000, Phytopathology.

[21]  M. Press,et al.  Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica. , 1999, The New phytologist.

[22]  H. Geiger,et al.  Improved methodologies for breeding striga-resistant sorghums , 2000 .

[23]  Jensen,et al.  Prediction of yield loss caused by Orobanche spp. in carrot and pea crops based on the soil seedbank , 1998 .

[24]  F. F. Bebawi,et al.  Efficacy of Ethylene as a Germination Stimulant of Striga hermonthica Seed , 1986, Weed Science.

[25]  C. T. D. Wit,et al.  A physical theory on placement of fertilizers , 1953 .

[26]  A. Oswald,et al.  Response of maize varieties to Striga infestation , 2004 .

[27]  J. Rodenburg,et al.  How can field selection for Striga resistance and tolerance in sorghum be improved , 2005 .

[28]  B. Reddy,et al.  Pattern analysis of genotype × environment interaction for striga resistance and grain yield in African sorghum trials , 2004, Euphytica.

[29]  M. Press,et al.  Do maize cultivars demonstrate tolerance to the parasitic weed Striga asiatica , 2002 .