On Improving Navigation Accuracy of GPS/INS Systems

Direct georeferencing, also referred to as direct platform orientation (DPO), is defined as direct measurement of the imaging sensor external orientation parameters (EOP), using positioning and orientation sensors, such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) and Inertial Navigation System (INS) or Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). Imaging sensors, most frequently supported by the DPO technique, are digital cameras, lidar systems, multi-spectral or hyper-spectral scanners, or interferometric synthetic aperture radar (INSAR). While for scanning sensors the use of DPO is compulsory, frame digital cameras can also directly benefit from this modern technique of sensor orientation. With direct sensor orientation, the requirement for ground control, tie-point matching and aerotriangulation (AT) is significantly reduced, or even entirely eliminated, resulting in shorter times of data acquisition and processing, and streamlined and highly automated data workflow and quality control. Most of the time, the requirement for ground control points is limited to periodic system calibrations and quality control check. Direct georeferencing is considered a fundamental technology of conventional mobile mapping systems (MMS). Despite significant progress in GSP/INS-based direct georeferencing technology in the last decade, there is still room for improvement in terms of better accuracy and better tolerance to GPS outages. This paper is focused on three error modeling and compensation techniques that could potentially improve GPS/INS system's performance on both land-based and airborne platforms: (1) extended gravity compensation, (2) IMU signal de-noising, and (3) stochastic modeling of IMU errors.

[1]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska DIRECT EXTERIOR ORIENTATION OF AIRBORNE IMAGERY WITH GPS/INS SYSTEM: PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS. , 1999 .

[2]  D. W. Allan,et al.  Statistics of atomic frequency standards , 1966 .

[3]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska High-Accuracy Airborne Integrated Mapping System , 1998 .

[4]  M. Cannon,et al.  An integrated INS/GPS approach to the georeferencing of remotely sensed data , 1993 .

[5]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska,et al.  Enhanced Gravity Compensation for Improved Inertial Navigation Accuracy , 2003 .

[6]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  Exterior Orientation By Direct Measurement Of Camera Position And Attitude , 1996 .

[7]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska,et al.  Gravity Modeling for High‐Accuracy GPS/INS Integration , 1998 .

[8]  Mohamed M. R. Mostafa,et al.  Airborne Kinematic Positioning and Attitude Determination Without Base Stations , 2001 .

[9]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Gravity on Precise, Short‐Term, 3‐D Free‐Inertial Navigation , 1997 .

[10]  D. M. Gleason,et al.  Extracting gravity vectors from the integration of global positioning system and inertial navigation system data , 1992 .

[11]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska,et al.  Bridging GPS Gaps in Urban Canyons: The Benefits of ZUPTs , 2001 .

[12]  Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinskaa,et al.  ON IMPROVED GRAVITY MODELING SUPPORTING DIRECT GEOREFERENCING OF MULTISENSOR SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[13]  Mohamed M. R. Mostafa Camera/IMU Boresight Calibration: New Advances and Performance Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Naser El-Sheimy,et al.  Navigating Urban Areas by VISAT—A Mobile Mapping System Integrating GPS/INS/Digital Cameras for GIS Applications , 1998 .

[15]  C. Jekeli Inertial navigation systems with geodetic applications , 2000 .

[16]  J. Skaloud Direct Georeferencing in Aerial Photogrammetric Mapping , 2002 .