An Improved Adaptive Subsurface Phytoplankton Layer Detection Method for Ocean Lidar Data

Phytoplankton, as the foundation of primary production, is of great significant for the marine ecosystem. The vertical distribution of phytoplankton contains key information about marine ecology and the optical properties of water bodies related to remote sensing.The common methods to detect subsurface phytoplankton biomass are often in situ measurements and passive remote sensing; however, the bio-argo measurement is discrete and costly, and the passive remote sensing measurement is limited to obtain the vertical information. As a component of active remote sensing, lidar technology has been proved as an effective method for mapping the vertical distribution of phytoplankton. In the past years, there have been few studies on the phytoplankton layer extraction method for lidar data. The existing subsurface layer extraction algorithms are often non-automatic, which need manual intervention or empirical parameters to set the layer extraction threshold. Hence, an improved adaptive subsurface phytoplankton layer detection method was proposed, which incorporates a curve fitting method and a robust estimation method to determine the depth and thickness of subsurface phytoplankton scattering layer. The combination of robust estimation method can realize automatic calculation of layer detection threshold according to the characteristic of each lidar signal, instead of an empirical fixed value used in previous works. In addition, the noise jamming signal can also be effectively detected and removed. Lidar data and in situ spatio-temporal matching Chlorophyll-a profile data obtained in Sanya Bay in 2018 was used for algorithm verification. The example result of step-by-step process illustrates that the improved method is available for adaptive threshold determination for layer detection and redundant noise signals elimination. Correlation analysis and statistical hypothesis testing shows the retrieved subsurface phytoplankton maximum depth by the improved method and in situ measurement is highly relevant. The absolute difference of layer maximum depth between lidar data and in situ data for all stations is less than 0.75 m, and mean absolute difference of layer thickness difference is about 1.74 m. At last, the improved method was also applied to the lidar data obtained near Wuzhizhou Island seawater, which proves that the method is feasiable and robust for various sea areas.

[1]  Xiaomei Lu,et al.  Annual boom-bust cycles of polar phytoplankton biomass revealed by space-based lidar , 2017 .

[2]  James H. Churnside,et al.  Comparison of data-processing algorithms for the lidar detection of mackerel in the Norwegian Sea , 2009 .

[3]  Victoria Hill,et al.  Estimates of primary production by remote sensing in the Arctic Ocean: Assessment of accuracy with passive and active sensors , 2010 .

[4]  P. Stabeno,et al.  Stratification, plankton layers, and mixing measured by airborne lidar in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas , 2020 .

[5]  Yongxiang Hu,et al.  Spaceborne Lidar in the Study of Marine Systems. , 2018, Annual review of marine science.

[6]  Michael S. Twardowski,et al.  Temporal and spatial occurrence of thin phytoplankton layers in relation to physical processes , 2001 .

[7]  P. Rousseeuw Robust estimation and identifying outliers , 1990 .

[8]  Jean Dubranna,et al.  Assessing phytoplankton community composition from hyperspectral measurements of phytoplankton absorption coefficient and remote-sensing reflectance in open-ocean environments , 2015 .

[9]  B. Worm,et al.  Global phytoplankton decline over the past century , 2010, Nature.

[10]  James H. Churnside,et al.  Thin scattering layers observed by airborne lidar , 2009 .

[11]  Peng Chen,et al.  Ocean Optical Profiling in South China Sea Using Airborne LiDAR , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Robert J. W. Brewin,et al.  A Consumer's Guide to Satellite Remote Sensing of Multiple Phytoplankton Groups in the Global Ocean , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[13]  Z. Zhenhua,et al.  Vertical distribution of subsurface phytoplankton layer in South China Sea using airborne lidar , 2021 .

[14]  Alison P. Chase,et al.  Shifts in Phytoplankton Community Structure Across an Anticyclonic Eddy Revealed From High Spectral Resolution Lidar Scattering Measurements , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[15]  Yury A. Goldin,et al.  Results of Barents Sea airborne lidar survey , 2007, Remote Sensing, Laser Probing, and Imagery in Natural Waters.

[16]  Delu Pan,et al.  A Feasible Calibration Method for Type 1 Open Ocean Water LiDAR Data Based on Bio-Optical Models , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[17]  James M. Sullivan,et al.  Coastal thin layer dynamics: Consequences to biology and optics , 2010 .

[18]  S. Maritorena,et al.  Global variability of phytoplankton functional types from space: assessment via the particle size distribution , 2010 .

[19]  Delu Pan,et al.  Semi-analytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model of laser propagation in inhomogeneous sea water within subsurface plankton layer , 2019, Optics & Laser Technology.

[20]  Delu Pan,et al.  Semi-Analytic Monte Carlo Model for Oceanographic Lidar Systems: Lookup Table Method Used for Randomly Choosing Scattering Angles , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[21]  L. Ostrovsky,et al.  Lidar observation of a strongly nonlinear internal wave train in the Gulf of Alaska , 2005 .

[22]  Daisuke Kitazawa,et al.  Optimized Algorithm for Processing Outlier of Water Current Data Measured by Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter , 2020 .