Estimating the modal parameters from multiple measurement setups using a joint state space model

Abstract Computing the modal parameters of structural systems often requires processing data from multiple non-simultaneously recorded setups of sensors. These setups share some sensors in common, the so-called reference sensors, which are fixed for all measurements, while the other sensors change their position from one setup to the next. One possibility is to process the setups separately resulting in different modal parameter estimates for each setup. Then, the reference sensors are used to merge or glue the different parts of the mode shapes to obtain global mode shapes, while the natural frequencies and damping ratios are usually averaged. In this paper we present a new state space model that processes all setups at once. The result is that the global mode shapes are obtained automatically, and only a value for the natural frequency and damping ratio of each mode is estimated. We also investigate the estimation of this model using maximum likelihood and the Expectation Maximization algorithm, and apply this technique to simulated and measured data corresponding to different structures.

[1]  F. Javier Cara,et al.  An approach to operational modal analysis using the expectation maximization algorithm , 2012 .

[2]  Randall L. Mayes,et al.  Consolidation of Modal Parameters from Several Extraction Sets , 2000 .

[3]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Ambient and free vibration tests of the Millau Viaduct: Evaluation of alternative processing strategies , 2012 .

[4]  R. Shumway,et al.  AN APPROACH TO TIME SERIES SMOOTHING AND FORECASTING USING THE EM ALGORITHM , 1982 .

[5]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Data merging for Multi Setup operational Modal Analysis with Data Driven SSI , 2011 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[7]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Modular Subspace-Based System Identification From Multi-Setup Measurements , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  P. Verboven,et al.  Identification of modal parameters from inconsistent data , 2002 .

[9]  A. Benveniste,et al.  MERGING SENSOR DATA FROM MULTIPLE MEASUREMENT SET-UPS FOR NON-STATIONARY SUBSPACE-BASED MODAL ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[10]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Pre- and Post-identification Merging for Multi-Setup OMA with Covariance-Driven SSI , 2011 .

[11]  R. Engle,et al.  Alternative Algorithms for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor , 1983 .

[12]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[13]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Merging Strategies for Multi-Setup Operational Modal Analysis: Application to the Luiz I steel Arch Bridge , 2009 .

[14]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[15]  E. Parloo,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of non-stationary operational data , 2003 .

[16]  L. Hermans,et al.  Modal parameter estimation from inconsistent data sets , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas B. Schön,et al.  System identification of nonlinear state-space models , 2011, Autom..

[18]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[19]  S. Koopman,et al.  Disturbance smoother for state space models , 1993 .

[20]  Kaare Brandt Petersen,et al.  The Matrix Cookbook , 2006 .

[21]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[22]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[23]  Siu-Kui Au Assembling mode shapes by least squares , 2011 .

[24]  Bart Peeters,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR BRIDGE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS , 2003 .