On the form of NTM onset scalings

Theoretically, the normalized plasma pressure (β) at which a neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) is triggered is expected to depend on normalized Larmor radius (ρ*) and normalized collisionality (ν), and this has formed the basis for the way in which NTM onset scalings are quoted for many devices. However, new analyses of JET data show that such ρ*–ν based scalings are non-predictive, with discharges largely following such scalings over the majority of their duration while in H-mode. Neural network techniques indicate that a key additional parameter to include is the sawtooth period, providing a better degree of predictability. Indeed, this parameter appears more important than ρ* in predicting NTM onset. Analysis using cases where sawteeth are modified by localized heating and current drive indicates that it is the sawtooth that governs where it is along the NTM onset scaling trajectory that the NTM is triggered, rather than leading to departures from the scaling. Finally, exploring data from cross-device similarity experiments shows similar absolute values in NTM onset βN across devices of differing size and ρ* range. This suggests the possibility that a simple ρ*-based extrapolation for ITER may be inappropriate and that NTM threshold levels may be more directly related to the absolute value of β, suggesting a higher β threshold for ITER, at least if large sawteeth are avoided.

[1]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  Threshold for neoclassical magnetic islands in a low collision frequency tokamak , 1996 .

[2]  S. D. Pinches,et al.  Reduction of the ion drive and ρ*θ scaling of the neoclassical tearing mode , 2002 .

[3]  James D. Callen,et al.  Dynamics of seed magnetic island formation due to geometrically coupled perturbations , 1998 .

[4]  E. J. Strait,et al.  The collisionality dependence of tokamak -limits , 1996 .

[5]  David P. Schissel,et al.  ITER H mode confinement database update , 1994 .

[6]  O. Sauter,et al.  Control of neoclassical tearing modes by sawtooth control. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  H. Zohm,et al.  ß scaling for the onset of neoclassical tearing modes at ASDEX Upgrade , 1998 .

[8]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Beta limits in long-pulse tokamak discharges , 1997 .

[9]  R. J. Buttery,et al.  Dimensionless scaling of the critical beta for onset of a neoclassical tearing mode , 2000 .

[10]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Control of sawteeth and triggering of NTMs with ion cyclotron resonance frequency waves in JET , 2002 .

[11]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Marginal β-limit for neoclassical tearing modes in JET H-mode discharges , 2002 .

[12]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Threshold for metastable tearing modes in DIII-D , 1998 .

[13]  Jet Team,et al.  Observation of neoclassical tearing modes in JET , 1999 .

[14]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  The role of polarization current in magnetic island evolution , 2001 .

[15]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Onset of neoclassical tearing modes on JET , 2003 .

[16]  R. Budny,et al.  Neutral beam stabilization of sawtooth oscillations in JET , 2002 .

[17]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Helical temperature perturbations associated with tearing modes in tokamak plasmas , 1995 .

[18]  G. Gantenbein,et al.  Neoclassical tearing modes and their stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive in ASDEX Upgrade , 2001 .

[19]  L. L. Lao,et al.  A mechanism for tearing onset near ideal stability boundaries , 2003 .

[20]  T. Luce,et al.  Tearing mode stability studies near ideal stability boundaries in DIII-D , 2002 .

[21]  G. McArdle,et al.  Neoclassical islands on COMPASS-D , 1997 .

[22]  E. J. Strait,et al.  MHD limits to tokamak operation and their control , 2003 .

[23]  H. Zohm,et al.  Neoclassical Tearing Modes , 2000 .