Plume Segmentation from UV Camera Images for SO2 Emission Rate Quantification on Cloud Days

We performed measurements of SO2 emissions with a high UV sensitive dual-camera optical system. Generally, in order to retrieve the two-dimensional SO2 emission rates of a source, e.g., the slant column density of a plume emitted by a stack, one needs to acquire four images with UV cameras: two images including the emitting stack at wavelengths with high and negligible absorption features (λon/off), and two additional images of the background intensity behind the plume, at the same wavelengths as before. However, the true background intensity behind a plume is impossible to obtain from a remote measurement site at rest, and thus, one needs to find a way to approximate the background intensity. Some authors have presented methods to estimate the background behind the plume from two emission images. However, those works are restricted to dealing with clear sky, or almost homogeneously illuminated days. The purpose of this work is to present a new approach using background images constructed from emission images by an automatic plume segmentation and interpolation procedure, in order to estimate the light intensity behind the plume. We compare the performance of the proposed approach with the four images method, which uses, as background, sky images acquired at a different viewing direction. The first step of the proposed approach involves the segmentation of the SO2 plume from the background. In clear sky days, we found similar results from both methods. However, when the illumination of the sky is non homogeneous, e.g., due to lateral sun illumination or clouds, there are appreciable differences between the results obtained by both methods. We present results obtained in a series of measurements of SO2 emissions performed on a cloudy day from a stack of an oil refinery in Montevideo City, Uruguay. The results obtained with the UV cameras were compared with scanning DOAS measurements, yielding a good agreement.

[1]  Harold B. McElhoe,et al.  Remote measurement of sulfur dioxide emissions using an ultraviolet light sensitive video system , 1986 .

[2]  Cynthia Werner,et al.  Assessment of the UV camera sulfur dioxide retrieval for point source plumes , 2009 .

[3]  Claudia Rivera,et al.  Tula industrial complex (Mexico) emissions of SO 2 and NO 2 during the MCMA 2006 field campaign using a mobile mini-DOAS system , 2009 .

[4]  Hai-ping Hu,et al.  Rare earth elements in sinters from the geothermal waters (hot springs) on the Tibetan Plateau, China , 2014 .

[5]  Mike Burton,et al.  The SO2 camera: A simple, fast and cheap method for ground‐based imaging of SO2 in volcanic plumes , 2006 .

[6]  T. Wagner,et al.  Ground based measurements of SO2 and NO2 emissions from the oil refinery "la Teja" in Montevideo city , 2011 .

[7]  Johannes Orphal,et al.  Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230–2380 nm region , 2003 .

[8]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Intercomparison of SO2 camera systems for imaging volcanic gas plumes , 2015 .

[9]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  IDOAS: A new monitoring technique to study the 2D distribution of volcanic gas emissions , 2006 .

[10]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  Use of Motion Estimation Algorithms for Improved Flux Measurements Using SO 2 Cameras , 2015 .

[11]  Robert G. Bryant,et al.  Protocols for UV camera volcanic SO2 measurements , 2010 .

[12]  Ann Carine Vandaele,et al.  Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm−1 to 10 000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K , 1998 .

[13]  A. McGonigle,et al.  UV camera measurements of fumarole field degassing (La Fossa crater, Vulcano Island) , 2011 .

[14]  Vincent J. Realmuto,et al.  Development of an ultra-violet digital camera for volcanic SO2 imaging , 2007 .

[15]  DOAS-measurement of the NO2 formation rate from NOx emissions into the atmosphere , 2011 .

[16]  Stefan Kraus,et al.  DOASIS: a framework design for DOAS , 2006 .

[17]  Christoph Kern,et al.  On the absolute calibration of SO 2 cameras , 2012 .

[18]  Jon Raffe Willmott,et al.  A Low-Cost Smartphone Sensor-Based UV Camera for Volcanic SO2 Emission Measurements , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[19]  A. Vandaele,et al.  SO2 Absorption Cross-section Measurement in the UV using a Fourier Transform Spectrometer , 1994 .

[20]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Theoretical description of functionality, applications, and limitations of SO 2 cameras for the remote sensing of volcanic plumes , 2010 .

[21]  Mike Burton,et al.  Validation of the SO2 camera for high temporal and spatial resolution monitoring of SO2 emissions , 2015 .

[22]  A. Prata Measuring SO 2 ship emissions with an ultraviolet imaging camera , 2013 .

[23]  Claudia Rivera,et al.  Quantification of NO2 and SO2 emissions from the Houston Ship Channel and Texas City industrial areas during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study , 2010 .

[24]  C. Oppenheimer,et al.  Accurate measurement of volcanic SO2 flux: Determination of plume transport speed and integrated SO2 concentration with a single device , 2005 .

[25]  Mike Burton,et al.  Volcanological applications of SO2 cameras , 2015 .

[26]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy , 2008 .

[27]  Christoph Kern,et al.  Radiative transfer corrections for accurate spectroscopic measurements of volcanic gas emissions , 2010 .

[28]  U. Platt,et al.  Differential Absorption Spectroscopy , 2008 .

[29]  Thomas C. Wilkes,et al.  A Novel and Inexpensive Method for Measuring Volcanic Plume Water Fluxes at High Temporal Resolution , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Keith A. Horton,et al.  Accurately measuring volcanic plume velocity with multiple UV spectrometers , 2006 .

[31]  Hugo Delgado-Granados,et al.  Image-based correction of the light dilution effect for SO2 camera measurements , 2015 .

[32]  Shin Yoshikawa,et al.  Effect of UV scattering on SO2 emission rate measurements , 2006 .

[33]  Erna Frins,et al.  Scanning and mobile multi-axis DOAS measurements of SO2 and NO2 emissions from an electric power plant in Montevideo, Uruguay , 2014 .

[34]  Geert K. Moortgat,et al.  Temperature dependence of the absorption cross sections of formaldehyde between 223 and 323 K in the wavelength range 225–375 nm , 2000 .