Failure Tolerance through Active Braking: A Kinematic Approach

For a manipulator operating in a hazardous or remote environment, an important concern is its capability after a component failure, since retrieval or repair is not always possible. Methods have been presented in the literature for optimizing capabilities after specific types of failures. However, techniques for achieving failure tolerance when conversion between failure types is possible has not been fully explored. This paper presents an approach to improving postfailure performance by converting between locked-joint failures and free-swinging failures through active braking. When a manipulator is moved slowly, gravitational forces can be used to control the failed joint in free-swinging mode, allowing the problem to be cast as a kinematic one. The validity of the kinematic formulation and its implementation and global consequences are explored.

[1]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Robust Joint and Cartesian Control of Underactuated Manipulators , 1996 .

[2]  A. A. Maciejewski,et al.  Dexterity optimization of kinematically redundant manipulators in the presence of joint failures , 1994 .

[3]  A. Liegeois,et al.  Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multi-body mechanisms , 1977 .

[4]  Giuseppe Oriolo,et al.  Control of mechanical systems with second-order nonholonomic constraints: underactuated manipulators , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Mapping tasks into fault tolerant manipulators , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Euclidean-space measures of robotic joint failures , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  Dynamic control of a manipulator with passive joints in operational space , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Robotic Workspaces after a Free-Swinging Failure , 1997, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[9]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Measuring and reducing the Euclidean-space effects of robotic joint failures , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  Position control of manipulator with passive joints using dynamic coupling , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  On the implementation of velocity control for kinematically redundant manipulators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Optimal control of manipulators with any number of passive joints , 1998 .

[14]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Fault tolerance for kinematically redundant manipulators: anticipating free-swinging joint failures , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  R. Paul Robot manipulators : mathematics, programming, and control : the computer control of robot manipulators , 1981 .

[16]  Rodney G. Roberts On the local fault tolerance of a kinematically redundant manipulator , 1996, J. Field Robotics.

[17]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  Position control system of a two degree of freedom manipulator with a passive joint , 1991 .

[18]  Adam Morecki,et al.  Basics of Robotics , 1999 .

[19]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Kinematic design of fault tolerant manipulators , 1992 .