Pre-lingually deaf children can perform as well as post-lingually deaf adults using cochlear implants

Abstract Both pre-lingually deaf children and post-lingually deaf adults benefit from cochlear implants. These adults have a memory for speech sounds, but the children do not. In this preliminary investigation, we asked whether it was possible for these children to obtain high scores similar to the adults. We compared 21 pre-lingually deaf children to 81 post-lingually deaf adults using multichannel cochlear implants on the same test of sentence recognition. The children were selected to have the vocabulary and language sufficient to complete the test. Scores from the children, ranged from 0 to 97% correct. About one half of the children scored above 70% correct. Scores from the adults ranged from 0 to 100% correct with about one half of the adults scoring over 60%. Many of the children are scoring as well or better than adults are scoring. We conclude that the auditory system of pre-lingually deaf children is sufficient to obtain levels of speech recognition similar to postlingually deaf adults

[1]  John Bamford,et al.  Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .

[2]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Cochlear Implantation: Relationships with Research on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[3]  T. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[4]  M F Dorman,et al.  Longitudinal changes in word recognition by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Elizabeth A. Engen Rhode Island Test of Language Structure , 1983 .

[6]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Knutson,et al.  Multivariate predictors of success with cochlear implants. , 1993, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[8]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[9]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Speech perception in prelingually implanted children after four years. , 1997, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[10]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[11]  B J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  R. Tyler What Can We Learn about Hearing Aids from Cochlear Implants? , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[13]  S. Telian,et al.  Cochlear Implantation of Children with Minimal Open‐Set Speech Recognition Skills , 1997, Ear and hearing.