Dynamic assessment of disparity vergence ramps

Previous work has shown that the disparity vergence eye movement system responds to inward (i.e., convergent) ramp stimuli with both smooth and step-like behavior depending on target velocity. The responses to diverging ramp stimuli have not been previously studied, but convergence and divergence responses to other stimuli often show different behaviors. Converging and diverging 6 degrees/s ramps were presented to four subjects over a stimulus range of 2 degrees-20 degrees. Step-like behavior was seen in both convergence and divergence responses, but the dynamics was different. For divergent ramps, the peak velocity of each step-like movement decreased as the stimulus moved away from the subject, but no such trend was observed for convergence. The step-like behavior seen in divergence supports the hypothesis that the transient component is active in disparity divergence similar to the transient component proposed for convergent movements. However, the transient component in divergence may be dependent on stimulus position which is not the case for convergence.

[1]  G K Hung,et al.  Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position , 2005, Vision Research.

[3]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[4]  L. Stark,et al.  Glissadic overshoots are due to pulse width errors. , 1978, Archives of neurology.

[5]  L E Mays,et al.  Neural control of vergence eye movements: activity of abducens and oculomotor neurons. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Helmchen,et al.  Age-related changes of vergence under natural viewing conditions , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[7]  Tara L. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of disparity vergence system responses to predictable and non-predictable stimulations , 2002 .

[8]  L M Optican,et al.  Saccade-vergence interactions in humans. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. E. Lieberman,et al.  Frequency limitations of the two-point central difference differentiation algorithm , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  George K. Hung,et al.  A Dual-Mode Dynamic Model of the Vergence Eye Movement System , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  M. Wheeler Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus , 1976 .

[12]  G. K. Noorden,et al.  Binocular vision and ocular motility;: Theory and management of strabismus , 1974 .

[13]  R Jones,et al.  Fusional vergence: sustained and transient components. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[14]  George K Hung,et al.  Dynamic asymmetries in disparity convergence eye movements , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  J L Semmlow,et al.  Closely spaced, fast dynamic movements in disparity vergence. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  G. Hung,et al.  Convergence and Divergence Exhibit Different Response Characteristics to Symmetric Stimuli , 1997, Vision Research.

[17]  L E Mays,et al.  Neural control of vergence eye movements: neurons encoding vergence velocity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.