An interatomic potential for saturated hydrocarbons based on the modified embedded-atom method.

In this work, we developed an interatomic potential for saturated hydrocarbons using the modified embedded-atom method (MEAM), a reactive semi-empirical many-body potential based on density functional theory and pair potentials. We parameterized the potential by fitting to a large experimental and first-principles (FP) database consisting of (1) bond distances, bond angles, and atomization energies at 0 K of a homologous series of alkanes and their select isomers from methane to n-octane, (2) the potential energy curves of H2, CH, and C2 diatomics, (3) the potential energy curves of hydrogen, methane, ethane, and propane dimers, i.e., (H2)2, (CH4)2, (C2H6)2, and (C3H8)2, respectively, and (4) pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) data of a dense high-pressure methane system with the density of 0.5534 g cc(-1). We compared the atomization energies and geometries of a range of linear alkanes, cycloalkanes, and free radicals calculated from the MEAM potential to those calculated by other commonly used reactive potentials for hydrocarbons, i.e., second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) and reactive force field (ReaxFF). MEAM reproduced the experimental and/or FP data with accuracy comparable to or better than REBO or ReaxFF. The experimental PVT data for a relatively large series of methane, ethane, propane, and butane systems with different densities were predicted reasonably well by the MEAM potential. Although the MEAM formalism has been applied to atomic systems with predominantly metallic bonding in the past, the current work demonstrates the promising extension of the MEAM potential to covalently bonded molecular systems, specifically saturated hydrocarbons and saturated hydrocarbon-based polymers. The MEAM potential has already been parameterized for a large number of metallic unary, binary, ternary, carbide, nitride, and hydride systems, and extending it to saturated hydrocarbons provides a reliable and transferable potential for atomistic/molecular studies of complex material phenomena involving hydrocarbon-metal or polymer-metal interfaces, polymer-metal nanocomposites, fracture and failure in hydrocarbon-based polymers, etc. The latter is especially true since MEAM is a reactive potential that allows for dynamic bond formation and bond breaking during simulation. Our results show that MEAM predicts the energetics of two major chemical reactions for saturated hydrocarbons, i.e., breaking a C-C and a C-H bond, reasonably well. However, the current parameterization does not accurately reproduce the energetics and structures of unsaturated hydrocarbons and, therefore, should not be applied to such systems.

[1]  R. L. Rowley,et al.  Determination of an ethane intermolecular potential model for use in molecular simulations from ab initio calculations , 1999 .

[2]  Eun-Ha Kim,et al.  The modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials and recent progress in atomistic simulations , 2010 .

[3]  Robert C. Weast,et al.  Handbook of chemistry and physics : a readyreference book of chemical and physical data , 1972 .

[4]  Norman L. Allinger,et al.  Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 3. The van der Waals' potentials and crystal data for aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons , 1989 .

[5]  H. Sun,et al.  COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase ApplicationsOverview with Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds , 1998 .

[6]  P. Burton,et al.  The (H2)2 potential surface and the interaction between hydrogen molecules at low temperatures , 1982 .

[7]  A. V. van Duin,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the interactions between TiO_2 nanoparticles and water with Na^+ and Cl^−, methanol, and formic acid using a reactive force field , 2013 .

[8]  S. G. Srinivasan,et al.  Modified Embedded Atom Method Study of the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Nickel Composites , 2010 .

[9]  G. Wagner,et al.  Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys , 2012 .

[10]  Jan M. L. Martin,et al.  Benchmark thermochemistry of the C(n)H(2n+2) alkane isomers (n = 2-8) and performance of DFT and composite ab initio methods for dispersion-driven isomeric equilibria. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[11]  F. Castro-Marcano,et al.  Comparison of thermal and catalytic cracking of 1-heptene from ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulations , 2013 .

[12]  A. V. van Duin,et al.  ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[13]  M. Baskes,et al.  Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals , 1984 .

[14]  Donald W. Brenner,et al.  A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons , 2002 .

[15]  Tzu-Ray Shan,et al.  Second-generation charge-optimized many-body potential for Si/SiO2 and amorphous silica , 2010 .

[16]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations , 1990 .

[17]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[18]  W. Goddard,et al.  Ab Initio Investigation of Ethane Dissociation Using Generalized Transition State Theory , 2001 .

[19]  Michael I. Baskes,et al.  Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded-atom-method potential , 2000 .

[20]  A. V. Duin,et al.  Reactive Potentials for Advanced Atomistic Simulations , 2013 .

[21]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  A second-order perturbative correction to the coupled-cluster singles and doubles method: CCSD(2) , 2001 .

[22]  Y. Kano,et al.  Liquid-Phase Thermodynamic Properties for Propane (1), n-Butane (2), and Isobutane (3) , 2005 .

[23]  S. Nosé A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods , 1984 .

[24]  Tao Liang,et al.  Variable charge reactive potential for hydrocarbons to simulate organic-copper interactions. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[25]  Susan B. Sinnott,et al.  Charge optimized many-body potential for the Si/SiO2 system , 2007 .

[26]  S. Robertson,et al.  PVT Properties of Methane and Propene to 10 kbar and 200°C , 1969 .

[27]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Advances in Methods and Algorithms in a Modern Quantum Chemistry Program Package , 2006 .

[28]  Norman L. Allinger,et al.  Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1 , 1989 .

[29]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[30]  R. D. Foltz CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data , 2000 .

[31]  S. G. Srinivasan,et al.  Multistate modified embedded atom method , 2007 .

[32]  M. Baskes,et al.  Modified embedded-atom potentials for cubic materials and impurities. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[33]  Wangyu Hu,et al.  Analytic modified embedded atom potentials for HCP metals , 2001 .

[34]  M. Baskes,et al.  Semiempirical atomic potentials for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, Al, and Pb based on first and second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method , 2003 .

[35]  R. L. Rowley,et al.  Ab initio potential energy surfaces of the propane dimer , 2002 .

[36]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) for Metals: Using Multiscale Modeling to Invigorate Engineering Design with Science , 2012 .

[37]  Nelson,et al.  Semiempirical modified embedded-atom potentials for silicon and germanium. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[38]  W. Jung,et al.  Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Fe–Ti–C and Fe–Ti–N ternary systems , 2008 .

[39]  M. Desjarlais,et al.  First-principles and classical molecular dynamics simulation of shocked polymers , 2010 .

[40]  Kristof M. Bal,et al.  Temperature influence on the reactivity of plasma species on a nickel catalyst surface: An atomic scale study , 2013 .

[41]  M. Baskes,et al.  Semiempirical, Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Metals , 1983 .

[42]  S. Monti,et al.  Reactive Dynamics Simulation of Monolayer and Multilayer Adsorption of Glycine on Cu(110) , 2013 .

[43]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  Partitioning Techniques in Coupled-Cluster Theory , 2003 .

[44]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Universal features of the equation of state of metals , 1984 .

[45]  Michael I. Baskes,et al.  Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method potentials for bcc transition metals , 2001 .

[46]  Marcus D. Hanwell,et al.  Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[47]  M. A. Bhatti,et al.  Practical Optimization Methods , 2000 .

[48]  G. C. Straty,et al.  PVT and Vapor Pressure Measurements on Ethane* , 1976, Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and chemistry.

[49]  A. Palavra,et al.  Automated High-Temperature PVT Apparatus With Data for Propane. , 1984, Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards.

[50]  F. Ma,et al.  Calculation of the surface energy of bcc metals by using the modified embedded‐atom method , 2003 .

[51]  M. Baskes Atomistic Potentials for the Molybdenum-Silicon System , 1998 .

[52]  Kyeongjae Cho,et al.  MEAM study of carbon atom interaction with Ni nano particle , 2009 .

[53]  D. Brenner,et al.  Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[54]  M. Baskes,et al.  Application of the embedded-atom method to covalent materials: A semiempirical potential for silicon. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[55]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[56]  F. Ma,et al.  Anisotropy analysis of the surface energy of diamond cubic crystals , 2003 .

[57]  Norman L. Allinger,et al.  Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 2. Vibrational frequencies and thermodynamics , 1989 .

[58]  Jenn-Huei Lii,et al.  An improved force field (MM4) for saturated hydrocarbons , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[59]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[60]  William E. Strawderman Practical Optimization Methods With Mathematica(R) Applications, Optimization Foundations and Applications , 2002 .

[61]  Murray S. Daw,et al.  The embedded-atom method: a review of theory and applications , 1993 .

[62]  Michael I. Baskes,et al.  Modified embedded atom potentials for HCP metals , 1994 .

[63]  K. Hall,et al.  Accurate PρT Data for Methane from (300 to 450) K up to 180 MPa , 2010 .

[64]  Fei Ma,et al.  Calculation of the surface energy of fcc metals with modified embedded-atom method , 2004 .

[65]  M. Baskes,et al.  Atomistic model of helium bubbles in gallium-stabilized plutonium alloys , 2006 .

[66]  A. V. Duin,et al.  ReaxFF: A Reactive Force Field for Hydrocarbons , 2001 .