Consistency index: measuring the performances of scholar journal reviewers

[1]  Barbara Howell,et al.  The Reliability of Peer Reviews of Papers on Information Systems , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Jeroen Smits,et al.  Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective , 2017, Scientometrics.

[3]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models , 2009, Scientometrics.

[4]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  "Getting in" revisited: an analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewers' ratings, and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  A. Link.  US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  C. Lance,et al.  The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria , 2006 .

[7]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals , 2019, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff , 2011, Scientometrics.

[9]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Truth Discovery with Multiple Conflicting Information Providers on the Web , 2008, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[10]  Domenic V. Cicchetti,et al.  Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data. , 1980 .

[11]  N. Black,et al.  Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Susan Eberley,et al.  Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review , 1990 .

[13]  Robert H. Fletcher,et al.  The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[14]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Scientific peer review , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Stefan Hirschauer,et al.  Editorial Judgments , 2010 .

[16]  S. Scarr,et al.  The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. , 1978 .

[17]  Stacy M Carter,et al.  Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Omar Sabaj Carlos González Álvaro Meruane,et al.  What We Still Don’t Know About Peer Review , 2016 .

[19]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Analyzing the association between referees' recommendations and editors' decisions , 2006, Scientometrics.