Airway Management of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: Survey Results from Physicians from 19 Countries in Latin America

Airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the most challenging aspects of care that anesthesiologists and intensivists face. This study was conducted to evaluate the management of tracheal intubation in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. This is a cross-sectional and international multicenter study based on a 37-item questionnaire. The survey was available to physicians who had performed intubations and tracheostomies in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and had provided informed consent to participate. The primary outcome is the preference to use a specific device for tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes are clinical practice variables, use of video laryngoscopes, difficult airway management, and safety features to prevent cross-infection. This study included 2411 physicians who performed an average of 11.90 and 20.67 tracheal intubations in patients diagnosed or suspected of having COVID-19 disease, respectively. Physicians were mainly from the specialties of Anesthesiology (61.2%) and Intensive Care (7.4%). COVID-19 infection diagnosed by positive PCR or serology in physicians participating in intubation in this study was 15.1%. Respondents considered preoxygenation for more than three minutes very useful (75.7%). The preferred device for tracheal intubation was the video laryngoscope (64.8%). However, the direct laryngoscope (57.9%) was the most commonly used, followed by the video laryngoscope (37.5%). The preferred device to facilitate intubation was the Eschmann guide (34.2%). Percutaneous tracheostomy was the preferred technique (39.5%) over the open tracheostomy (22%). The predicted or unpredicted difficult airway management in these patients was preferably performed with a video laryngoscope (61.7% or 63.7, respectively). Intubation was mostly performed by two or more expert airway physicians (61.6%). The use of personal protective equipment increased the practitioners’ discomfort during intubation maneuvers. The video laryngoscope is the preferred device for intubating patients with COVID-19, combined with the Eschmann guide, flexible stylet within the endotracheal tube, or Frova guide to facilitate intubation. The sub-analysis of the two groups of physicians by the level of intubation experience showed a higher use of the video laryngoscope (63.4%) in the experts group and no significant differences between the two groups in terms of cross-infection rates in physicians, in their preference for the use of the video laryngoscope or in the number of intubations performed in confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients.

[1]  J. Álvarez Escudero,et al.  Airway management of COVID-19 patients: A survey on the experience of 1125 physicians in Spain , 2022, Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition).

[2]  L. Cabrini,et al.  Early versus late tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients: a "pros/cons" debate also considering heart-lung interactions , 2021, Minerva Cardiology and Angiology.

[3]  A. Kotanidou,et al.  Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies , 2021, Critical Care.

[4]  J. Álvarez Escudero,et al.  Manejo de vía aérea en pacientes COVID-19: una encuesta sobre la experiencia de 1125 médicos en España , 2021, Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación.

[5]  K. Chew,et al.  COVID-19 aerosol box as protection from droplet and aerosol contaminations in healthcare workers performing airway intubation: a randomised cross-over simulation study , 2020, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  J. D. Young,et al.  Prognostic Factors for 30-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Observational Cohort Study , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[7]  E. Violato,et al.  Impact of aerosol box on intubation during COVID-19: a simulation study of normal and difficult airways , 2020, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[8]  M. Moghadami,et al.  COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in southwest Iran , 2020, Virology Journal.

[9]  S. Pocock,et al.  Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID‐19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study , 2020, Anaesthesia.

[10]  William L. Hamilton,et al.  Screening of healthcare workers for SARS-CoV-2 highlights the role of asymptomatic carriage in COVID-19 transmission , 2020, medRxiv.

[11]  Hongjun Xiao,et al.  Safe and effective management of tracheostomy in COVID‐19 patients , 2020, Head & neck.

[12]  S. Jaber,et al.  Airway management for COVID-19: a move towards universal videolaryngoscope? , 2020, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

[13]  E. Genden,et al.  Tracheostomy during SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: Recommendations from the New York Head and Neck Society , 2020, Head & neck.

[14]  B. Miles Tracheostomy During the COV-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Recommendations from the New York Head and Neck Society , 2020 .

[15]  P. Wouters,et al.  Thoracic Anesthesia of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Preliminary Recommendations for Airway Management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee , 2020, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

[16]  L. Fleisher,et al.  Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: lessons learnt and international expert recommendations , 2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia.

[17]  Giuseppe Citerio,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  T. Cook,et al.  Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID‐19 , 2020, Anaesthesia.

[19]  B. Orser,et al.  Recommendations for Endotracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients , 2020, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  R. Trimble COVID-19 Dashboard , 2020 .

[21]  K. Yuen,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Wax,et al.  Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients , 2020, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[23]  D. Benhamou,et al.  Effect of Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in the Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia: The IRIS Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA surgery.

[24]  N. Shallik,et al.  Is it time for high flow nasal oxygen to be included in the difficult airway algorithm? , 2018, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  T M Cook,et al.  Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  J. Ashurst,et al.  Comparison of intubation devices in level C personal protective equipment: A cadaveric study , 2017, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[27]  H. Kwak,et al.  Stylet angulation for routine endotracheal intubation with McGrath videolaryngoscope , 2017, Medicine.

[28]  Chitra Mehta,et al.  Percutaneous Tracheostomy , 2017, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia.

[29]  T. Cook The cricoid debate – balancing risks and benefits , 2016, Anaesthesia.

[30]  B. Winkens,et al.  Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel , 2016, Anaesthesia.

[31]  Khai Tran,et al.  Aerosol Generating Procedures and Risk of Transmission of Acute Respiratory Infections to Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  M. Loeb,et al.  Risk Factors for SARS Transmission from Patients Requiring Intubation: A Multicentre Investigation in Toronto, Canada , 2010, PloS one.

[33]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.