Towards an Unstaggered Finite‐Volume Dynamical Core With a Fast Riemann Solver: 1‐D Linearized Analysis of Dissipation, Dispersion, and Noise Control

Many computational fluid dynamics codes use Riemann solvers on an unstaggered grid for finite volume methods, but this approach is computationally expensive compared to existing atmospheric dynamical cores equipped with hyper‐diffusion or other similar relatively simple diffusion forms. We present a simplified Low Mach number Approximate Riemann Solver (LMARS), made computationally efficient through assumptions appropriate for atmospheric flows: low Mach number, weak discontinuities, and locally uniform sound speed. This work will examine the dissipative and dispersive properties of LMARS using Von Neumann linearized analysis to the one‐dimensional linearized shallow water equations. We extend these analyses to higher‐order methods by numerically solving the Fourier‐transformed equations. It is found that the pros and cons due to grid staggering choices diminish with high‐order schemes. The linearized analysis is limited to modal, smooth solutions using simple numerical schemes, and cannot analyze solutions with discontinuities. To address this problem, this work presents a new idealized test of a discontinuous wave packet, a single Fourier mode modulated by a discontinuous square wave. The experiments include studies of well‐resolved and (near) grid‐scale wave profiles, as well as the representation of discontinuous features and the results are validated against the Von Neumann analysis. We find the higher‐order LMARS produces much less numerical noise than do inviscid unstaggered and especially staggered schemes while retaining accuracy for better‐resolved modes.

[1]  Daniel Y. Le Roux,et al.  Dispersion analysis of compatible Galerkin schemes for the 1D shallow water model , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Francis X. Giraldo,et al.  Efficient construction of unified continuous and discontinuous Galerkin formulations for the 3D Euler equations , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  Shian‐Jiann Lin,et al.  High-Resolution Climate Simulations Using GFDL HiRAM with a Stretched Global Grid , 2016 .

[4]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  High-Order Finite-Volume Transport on the Cubed Sphere: Comparison between 1D and 2D Reconstruction Schemes , 2015 .

[5]  James Kent,et al.  Determining the effective resolution of advection schemes. Part I: Dispersion analysis , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Francis X. Giraldo,et al.  Analysis of adaptive mesh refinement for IMEX discontinuous Galerkin solutions of the compressible Euler equations with application to atmospheric simulations , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Paul A. Ullrich,et al.  Understanding the treatment of waves in atmospheric models. Part 1: The shortest resolved waves of the 1D linearized shallow‐water equations , 2014 .

[8]  Nigel Wood,et al.  Runge-Kutta IMEX schemes for the Horizontally Explicit/Vertically Implicit (HEVI) solution of wave equations , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Bram van Leer,et al.  A Control-Volume Model of the Compressible Euler Equations with a Vertical Lagrangian Coordinate , 2013 .

[10]  Colin J. Cotter,et al.  Analysis of a mixed finite-element pair proposed for an atmospheric dynamical core , 2013 .

[11]  Shian-Jiann Lin,et al.  A Two-Way Nested Global-Regional Dynamical Core on the Cubed-Sphere Grid , 2013 .

[12]  F. X. Giraldo Continuous and Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Atmospheric Modeling , 2013 .

[13]  Francis X. Giraldo,et al.  Continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a scalable three-dimensional nonhydrostatic atmospheric model: Limited-area mode , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Christiane Jablonowski,et al.  MCore: A non-hydrostatic atmospheric dynamical core utilizing high-order finite-volume methods , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Christiane Jablonowski,et al.  An analysis of 1D finite-volume methods for geophysical problems on refined grids , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Bram van Leer,et al.  High-order finite-volume methods for the shallow-water equations on the sphere , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  D. Durran,et al.  An Idealized Comparison of One-Way and Two-Way Grid Nesting , 2010 .

[18]  Chao Yang,et al.  A Fully Implicit Domain Decomposition Algorithm for Shallow Water Equations on the Cubed-Sphere , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[19]  William C. Skamarock,et al.  A Linear Analysis of the NCAR CCSM Finite-Volume Dynamical Core , 2008 .

[20]  Francis X. Giraldo,et al.  A study of spectral element and discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Navier-Stokes equations in nonhydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric modeling: Equation sets and test cases , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Peter H. Lauritzen,et al.  A stability analysis of finite-volume advection schemes permitting long time steps , 2007 .

[22]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  Shian‐Jiann Lin A “Vertically Lagrangian” Finite-Volume Dynamical Core for Global Models , 2004 .

[24]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[25]  Shian‐Jiann Lin,et al.  Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Transport Schemes , 1996 .

[26]  David A. Randall,et al.  Geostrophic Adjustment and the Finite-Difference Shallow-Water Equations , 1994 .

[27]  ShuChi-Wang,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II , 1989 .

[28]  C. Hirsch Numerical computation of internal and external flows , 1988 .

[29]  P. Woodward,et al.  The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas Dynamical Simulations , 1984 .

[30]  P. Lax,et al.  On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1983 .

[31]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[32]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model , 1977 .

[33]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme , 1974 .