Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality

A recurrent idea in the study of complex systems is that optimal information processing is to be found near phase transitions. However, this heuristic hypothesis has few (if any) concrete realizations where a standard and biologically relevant quantity is optimized at criticality. Here we give a clear example of such a phenomenon: a network of excitable elements has its sensitivity and dynamic range maximized at the critical point of a non-equilibrium phase transition. Our results are compatible with the essential role of gap junctions in olfactory glomeruli and retinal ganglionar cell output. Synchronization and global oscillations also emerge from the network dynamics. We propose that the main functional role of electrical coupling is to provide an enhancement of dynamic range, therefore allowing the coding of information spanning several orders of magnitude. The mechanism could provide a microscopic neural basis for psychophysical laws.

[1]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[3]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  In Neural Computation , 2022 .

[4]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Computation at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation , 1990 .

[5]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[6]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[7]  Thomas A. Cleland,et al.  Concentration Tuning Mediated by Spare Receptor Capacity in Olfactory Sensory Neurons: A Theoretical Study , 1999, Neural Computation.

[8]  R. Dickman,et al.  Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models , 1999 .

[9]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Scale-invariance as a unifying psychological principle , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  F. Jülicher,et al.  Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  T J Lewis,et al.  Self-organized synchronous oscillations in a network of excitable cells coupled by gap junctions , 2000, Network.

[12]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Representation of Odorants by Receptor Neuron Input to the Mouse Olfactory Bulb , 2001, Neuron.

[14]  John Rinzel,et al.  Topological target patterns and population oscillations in a network with random gap junctional coupling , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[15]  J. Reisert,et al.  Response properties of isolated mouse olfactory receptor cells , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Mauro Copelli,et al.  Physics of psychophysics: Stevens and Weber-Fechner laws are transfer functions of excitable media. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  S. Bloomfield,et al.  Connexin36 Is Essential for Transmission of Rod-Mediated Visual Signals in the Mammalian Retina , 2002, Neuron.

[18]  Gilles Laurent,et al.  Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Korsching,et al.  Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Restrepo,et al.  Expression of connexin 45 in the olfactory system , 2002, Brain Research.

[21]  K. Abbink,et al.  24 , 1871, You Can Cross the Massacre on Foot.

[22]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Bill S Hansson,et al.  Extreme sensitivity in an olfactory system. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[24]  Dante R. Chialvo.  Critical brain networks , 2004 .

[25]  Y. Kurosawa,et al.  Dendrodendritic Electrical Synapses between Mammalian Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Monyer,et al.  Pannexin1 and Pannexin2 expression in the developing and mature rat brain. , 2005, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[27]  K. Willecke,et al.  Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Timm Schubert,et al.  Connexin36 mediates gap junctional coupling of alpha‐ganglion cells in mouse retina , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Hannah Monyer,et al.  Connexin36 Mediates Spike Synchrony in Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  Mauro Copelli,et al.  Signal compression in the sensory periphery , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[31]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  The Role of Distal Dendritic Gap Junctions in Synchronization of Mitral Cell Axonal Output , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[32]  T. Kosaka,et al.  Neuronal gap junctions in the mouse main olfactory bulb: Morphological analyses on transgenic mice , 2005, Neuroscience.

[33]  John M Beggs,et al.  Critical branching captures activity in living neural networks and maximizes the number of metastable States. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[34]  Takashi Kurahashi,et al.  Mechanisms determining the dynamic range of the bullfrog olfactory receptor cell. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  O. Kinouchi,et al.  Intensity coding in two-dimensional excitable neural networks , 2004, q-bio/0409032.

[36]  Mauro Copelli,et al.  Response of electrically coupled spiking neurons: a cellular automaton approach. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.