Trusting Sensors Measurements in a WSN: An Approach Based on True and Group Deviation Estimation

Quality-of-service (QoS) and accuracy are of prime importance in WSN-based monitoring applications, as they may need to report real-time measurements leading to efficient decision making. The tiny sensors are often subject to measurement errors, say noise, and prone to failures and attacks, as their physical characteristics change easily due to environmental abnormality and mechanical shock. Faulty information may induce erroneous decisions, which may significantly impact the performance of the network and its service quality. Thus, the sensors’ need to be calibrated periodically and its data has to be trustworthy in making a good decision. In this paper, we have proposed a trust management framework based on true and group deviation metrics to analyze the accuracy and trustworthiness of the sensors’ data. We have derived an analytical model to calibrate the sensors periodically and to examine the trustworthiness. Our simulation results on testing a real-time fire monitoring system showed that the proposed trust framework is efficient in producing 95% accurate and trusted measurements by limiting the frequency of sensor calibrations to a very low value and by setting a lower boundary of 5% deviation from the true and group value metrics.

[1]  Yang Xiang,et al.  A novel multiple-level trust management framework for wireless sensor networks , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to In-Place Sensor Calibration , 2003, IPSN.

[3]  Adedeji Badiru,et al.  Handbook of Measurements : Benchmarks for Systems Accuracy and Precision , 2015 .

[4]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  Trust management system in wireless sensor networks: design considerations and research challenges , 2015, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[5]  Yang Fangchun A Trust Evaluation Method of Sensors Based on Energy Monitoring , 2013 .

[6]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  An Efficient Distributed Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[7]  Stephen A. Dyer,et al.  Survey of instrumentation and measurement , 2001 .

[8]  Rodrigo Roman,et al.  Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices , 2010, Comput. Commun..

[9]  Natarajan Meghanathan A Distributed Trust Evaluation Model for Wireless Mobile Sensor Networks , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[10]  David E. Culler,et al.  Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[11]  Ziwen Sun,et al.  A Lightweight and Dependable Trust Model for Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, ICCCS.

[12]  Zhenguo Chen,et al.  Trust Model of Wireless Sensor Networks and Its Application in Data Fusion , 2017, Sensors.

[13]  Heejo Lee,et al.  Group-Based Trust Management Scheme for Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[14]  Paulvanna Nayaki Marimuthu,et al.  Development of Analytical Model for Data Trustworthiness in Sensor Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA).

[15]  Paulvanna Nayaki Marimuthu,et al.  Reputation Analysis of Sensors' Trust Within Tabu Search , 2017, WorldCIST.

[16]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Comparative study of trust and reputation systems for wireless sensor networks , 2013, Secur. Commun. Networks.