Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis.

PURPOSE To evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), optic nerve head (ONH), and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using the RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph. DESIGN Diagnostic, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty eyes of 106 glaucoma patients and 74 eyes of 40 healthy subjects from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). METHODS All patients underwent ocular imaging with the commercially available RTVue. Optic nerve head, RNFL thickness, and macular thickness scans were obtained during the same visit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and sensitivities at fixed specificities (80% and 95%) were calculated for each parameter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) and sensitivities at fixed specificities of 80% and 95%. RESULTS The AUC for the RNFL parameter with best performance, inferior quadrant thickness, was significantly higher than that of the best-performing ONH parameter, inferior rim area (0.884 vs 0.812, respectively; P = 0.04). There was no difference between ROC curve areas of the best RNFL thickness parameters and the best inner macular thickness measurement, ganglion cell complex root mean square (ROC curve area = 0.870). CONCLUSIONS The RTVue RNFL and inner retinal macular thickness measurements had good ability to detect eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss and performed significantly better than ONH parameters.

[1]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  G. Mcgwin,et al.  Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Mitra Sehi,et al.  Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  T. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users ' Guides to the Medical Literature : III . How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test : A . Are the Results of the Study Valid ? , 2022 .

[7]  Anders Heijl,et al.  Glaucoma Detection by Stratus OCT , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test A. Are the Results of the Study Valid? , 1994 .

[10]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[12]  K J Rothman,et al.  No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons , 1990, Epidemiology.

[13]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  F. Medeiros,et al.  The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Dong Myung Kim,et al.  Ability of Stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in glaucoma. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  J. G. Babu,et al.  Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Pandey,et al.  Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Y. T. van der Schouw,et al.  Guidelines for the Assessment of New Diagnostic Tests , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[20]  Felipe A Medeiros,et al.  How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[23]  J. Duker,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. , 2004, Optics express.

[24]  J Zhang,et al.  Some statistical methods for multiple endpoints in clinical trials. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[25]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Detection of Early Glaucoma With Optical Coherence Tomography (StratusOCT) , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[26]  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disk algorithms with optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[28]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[29]  R. Ritch,et al.  Assessment of a Race-specific Normative HRT-III Database to Differentiate Glaucomatous From Normal Eyes , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[30]  S. Yun,et al.  In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. , 2004, Optics express.

[31]  Philipp Dahm,et al.  Evidence-Based Surgery Chirurgie factuelle Users ’ guides to the surgical literature : how to use an article about a diagnostic test , 2001 .

[32]  B Rosner,et al.  Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.  Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[34]  A. Olshan,et al.  Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[35]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  C. Ramsay,et al.  Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  L. Sakata,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.