Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert N Weinreb | Harsha L Rao | Pamela A Sample | Linda M Zangwill | Felipe A Medeiros | F. Medeiros | L. Zangwill | R. Weinreb | P. Sample | L. Alencar | H. Rao | Luciana M Alencar
[1] F. Medeiros,et al. Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[2] F. Medeiros,et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.
[3] G. Mcgwin,et al. Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[4] Mitra Sehi,et al. Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.
[5] T. Perneger. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.
[6] G. Guyatt,et al. Users ' Guides to the Medical Literature : III . How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test : A . Are the Results of the Study Valid ? , 2022 .
[7] Anders Heijl,et al. Glaucoma Detection by Stratus OCT , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.
[8] G. Wollstein,et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.
[9] Gordon H. Guyatt,et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test A. Are the Results of the Study Valid? , 1994 .
[10] G. Wollstein,et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.
[11] Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .
[12] K J Rothman,et al. No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons , 1990, Epidemiology.
[13] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.
[14] F. Medeiros,et al. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[15] Dong Myung Kim,et al. Ability of Stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in glaucoma. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[16] M F Huque,et al. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.
[17] J. G. Babu,et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. , 2007, Ophthalmology.
[18] R. Pandey,et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[19] Y. T. van der Schouw,et al. Guidelines for the Assessment of New Diagnostic Tests , 1995, Investigative radiology.
[20] Felipe A Medeiros,et al. How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[21] P. Bossuyt,et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.
[22] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.
[23] J. Duker,et al. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. , 2004, Optics express.
[24] J Zhang,et al. Some statistical methods for multiple endpoints in clinical trials. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.
[25] J. Caprioli,et al. Detection of Early Glaucoma With Optical Coherence Tomography (StratusOCT) , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.
[26] Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi,et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disk algorithms with optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.
[27] M. Pepe. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .
[28] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. , 2008, Ophthalmology.
[29] R. Ritch,et al. Assessment of a Race-specific Normative HRT-III Database to Differentiate Glaucomatous From Normal Eyes , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.
[30] S. Yun,et al. In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. , 2004, Optics express.
[31] Philipp Dahm,et al. Evidence-Based Surgery Chirurgie factuelle Users ’ guides to the surgical literature : how to use an article about a diagnostic test , 2001 .
[32] B Rosner,et al. Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.
[33] Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. , 2002, Biostatistics.
[34] A. Olshan,et al. Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.
[35] Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.
[36] C. Ramsay,et al. Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[37] L. Sakata,et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.