Social Value Orientation: Related to Empathy and the Ability to Read the Mind in the Eyes

This study explores correlates of social value orientation, a personality trait that reflects a stable individual difference in the way people evaluate outcomes for themselves and others in situations of interdependence. Previous findings (e.g., the triangle hypothesis) have indicated that people with a prosocial orientation tend to view their interacting partners as having heterogeneous social motives, whereas people with a proself orientation tend to believe all people are alike and selfish. Consistent with this idea that people vary in their perception of other's social motives, the data in this study indicate that a prosocial orientation correlated positively with the ability to adopt another person's point of view and infer mental states from eye gazes. These social skills correlated negatively with an individualistic orientation.

[1]  J. L. Holland,et al.  A theory of vocational choice. , 1959 .

[2]  Exploring the role of consistency of social value orientations : temporal stability, reciprocal cooperation, and forgiveness , 2002 .

[3]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Business Simulation. , 1995 .

[4]  P. Lange.  Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis , 1992 .

[5]  D. Romney,et al.  The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. , 1997, Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs.

[6]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. , 1997, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[7]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism ☆ , 2007 .

[8]  J. Decety,et al.  Human Empathy Through the Lens of Social Neuroscience , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[9]  David De Cremer,et al.  All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation , 2005 .

[10]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[11]  Robert Eisenberger,et al.  Effects of social values, effort training, and goal structure on task persistence. , 1992 .

[12]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy , 2005, The American economic review.

[14]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity , 2001 .

[15]  H. Triandis,et al.  Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation , 1985 .

[16]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  S. Herpertz,et al.  Oxytocin Improves “Mind-Reading” in Humans , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  J. Iedema,et al.  Perceived consensus of one's social value orientation in different populations in public and private circumstances , 1995 .

[19]  S. Baron-Cohen.  The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain , 2007 .

[20]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[21]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient , 2004, Psychological Medicine.

[22]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[23]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[24]  T. Tyler,et al.  Managing cooperation via procedural fairness: The mediating influence of self-other merging , 2005 .

[25]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[26]  J. Iedema,et al.  Causal attribution and self‐justification as explanations for the consensus expectation of one's social value orientation , 1994 .

[27]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Is There a "Language of the Eyes"? Evidence from Normal Adults, and Adults with Autism or Asperger Syndrome , 1997 .

[29]  M. Vugt.  Abslracl Commuting by car or public transportation ? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements , 2004 .

[30]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[31]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  Do not prime hawks with doves: the interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  S. Herpertz,et al.  xytocin Improves “ Mind-Reading ” in Humans , 2007 .

[33]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game , 2001 .

[34]  A. Semin-Goossens,et al.  The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation , 1998 .

[35]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers , 1973 .

[36]  Kennon M. Sheldon.  Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat : Even competitors can get the message , 1999 .

[37]  van der Taco Vaart,et al.  Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem‐solving behavior , 2002 .

[38]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  David De Cremer,et al.  Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining , 2004 .

[40]  T. Gärling.  Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas , 1999 .

[41]  Jurjen Iedema,et al.  Effects of social value orientation on expecting and learning others' orientations , 1994 .

[42]  C. Agnew,et al.  From Game Theory to Real Life: How Social Value Orientation Affects Willingness to Sacrifice in Ongoing Close Relationships , 1997 .

[43]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma , 1999 .

[44]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .