Diminished distractor exclusion for magnocellular features near the hand

The modulated visual pathway (MVP) hypothesis attempts to explain a range of differences observed in the processing of objects in the proximal as compared to the distal region of the hand. However, there has been no account of how ‘hand proximity’ interacts with task relevance within the MVP framework. In the present study, we used a visual search task to test whether the task relevance of a unique feature (motion in Expt. 1, and color in Expt. 2) influences its processing with respect to the hand. The feature was either relevant (Expt. 1a and 2a) or irrelevant (Expt. 1b and 2b) to the search task. The hand proximity effect was observed only in the experiments in which the unique feature was task irrelevant. However, the effect of hand proximity was overridden when the unique feature was predictive of the target location. We propose that it is difficult to accomplish active distractor rejection of magnocellular features near the hand. Similarly, there is improved active distractor rejection of parvocellular features in the distal region of the hand. Overall, the results suggest that processes involving active distractor rejection may drive the attentional effect of hand proximity.

[1]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[2]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Long-term abstract learning of attentional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Jill A Dosso,et al.  The fragility of the near hand effect , 2018 .

[4]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  A. Mühlenen,et al.  The role of flicker and abrupt displacement in attention capture by motion onsets , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. M. Sunny,et al.  Slower attentional disengagement but faster perceptual processing near the hand. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Shaun P Vecera,et al.  Attention Affects Visual Perceptual Processing Near the Hand , 2010, Psychological science.

[10]  Christopher C. Davoli,et al.  Altered vision near the hands , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  Michael Zehetleitner,et al.  Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Improved change detection with nearby hands , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory , 2011, Visual cognition.

[15]  C. Gross,et al.  A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[17]  J. Pratt,et al.  A touchy subject: advancing the modulated visual pathways account of altered vision near the hand , 2014, Translational neuroscience.

[18]  A. Mühlenen,et al.  Motion onset does not capture attention when subsequent motion is “smooth” , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[20]  J. Pratt,et al.  Reduced Temporal Fusion in Near-Hand Space , 2013, Psychological science.

[21]  J. Pratt,et al.  The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Hand position influences perceptual grouping , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Greg L. West,et al.  Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways , 2012, Cognition.

[25]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Daniel B. Vatterott,et al.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  S. Luck,et al.  How the Brain Prevents and Terminates Shifts of Attention , 2014 .

[29]  J. Brockmole,et al.  Hand proximity differentially affects visual working memory for color and orientation in a binding task , 2014, Front. Psychol..