Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording

OBJECTIVE Closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems have the potential to optimize treatment of movement disorders by enabling automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters based on a feedback signal. Evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the DBS electrode may serve as suitable closed-loop control signals. The objective of this study was to understand better the factors that influence ECAP and LFP recording, including the physical presence of the electrode, the geometrical dimensions of the electrode, and changes in the composition of the peri-electrode space across recording conditions. APPROACH Coupled volume conductor-neuron models were used to calculate single-unit activity as well as ECAP responses and LFP activity from a population of model thalamic neurons. MAIN RESULTS Comparing ECAPs and LFPs measured with and without the presence of the highly conductive recording contacts, we found that the presence of these contacts had a negligible effect on the magnitude of single-unit recordings, ECAPs (7% RMS difference between waveforms), and LFPs (5% change in signal magnitude). Spatial averaging across the contact surface decreased the ECAP magnitude in a phase-dependent manner (74% RMS difference), resulting from a differential effect of the contact on the contribution from nearby or distant elements, and decreased the LFP magnitude (25% change). Reductions in the electrode diameter or recording contact length increased signal energy and increased spatial sensitivity of single neuron recordings. Moreover, smaller diameter electrodes (500 µm) were more selective for recording from local cells over passing axons, with the opposite true for larger diameters (1500 µm). Changes in electrode dimensions had phase-dependent effects on ECAP characteristics, and generally had small effects on the LFP magnitude. ECAP signal energy and LFP magnitude decreased with tighter contact spacing (100 µm), compared to the original dimensions (1500 µm), with the opposite effect on the ECAP at longer contact-to-contact distances (2000 µm). Finally, acute edema reduced the single neuron and population ECAP signal energy, as well as LFP magnitude, and glial encapsulation had the opposite effect, after accounting for loss of cells in the peri-electrode space. SIGNIFICANCE This study determined recording conditions and electrode designs that influence ECAP and LFP recording fidelity.

[1]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Neural origin of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Lorenz M. Hofmann,et al.  Modeling of a Segmented Electrode for Desynchronizing Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Front. Neuroeng..

[3]  R. Bayford,et al.  The influence of reactivity of the electrode–brain interface on the crossing electric current in therapeutic deep brain stimulation , 2008, Neuroscience.

[4]  Leonard K. Kaczmarek,et al.  High-frequency firing helps replenish the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles , 1998, Nature.

[5]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. P. van Dijk,et al.  Evidence of Potential Averaging over the Finite Surface of a Bioelectric Surface Electrode , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Role of electrode design on the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  High efficiency electrodes for deep brain stimulation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  A. Gabrielli,et al.  Clinical Utility of Serum Levels of Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase as a Biomarker for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2022 .

[11]  C. Koch,et al.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Priori,et al.  Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) controlled by local field potential oscillations , 2013, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Dependence of Scalar Potential Measurements on Electrode Geometry , 1965 .

[15]  C. Bédard,et al.  Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[16]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation programming. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  R Schoonhoven,et al.  On the optimal choice of a recording electrode in electroneurography. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Current-controlled deep brain stimulation reduces in vivo voltage fluctuations observed during voltage-controlled stimulation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  H. Helmholtz Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch‐elektrischen Versuche , 1853 .

[20]  B. Mädler,et al.  Individual Fiber Anatomy of the Subthalamic Region Revealed With Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Concept to Identify the Deep Brain Stimulation Target for Tremor Suppression , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[21]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential , 2005, Hearing Research.

[22]  Scott F. Lempka,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of the Local Field Potential in Deep Brain Stimulation Applications , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  Brian H. Tracey,et al.  Computationally efficient bioelectric field modeling and effects of frequency-dependent tissue capacitance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  M L Hines,et al.  Neuron: A Tool for Neuroscientists , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[25]  Kensall D. Wise,et al.  A Low-Capacitance Multielectrode Probe for Use in Extracellular Neurophysiology , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[27]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Time dependent subthalamic local field potential changes after DBS surgery in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[28]  Alexander R. Kent,et al.  Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Aviva Abosch,et al.  Improved spatial targeting with directionally segmented deep brain stimulation leads for treating essential tremor , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  G V Dimitrov,et al.  Effect of electrode dimensions on motor unit potentials. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  Jaimie M. Henderson,et al.  The STN beta-band profile in Parkinson's disease is stationary and shows prolonged attenuation after deep brain stimulation , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[32]  A. Lundquist,et al.  Thalamic and Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Where Is the Optimal Target? , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[33]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  Effect of Dispersive Conductivity and Permittivity in Volume Conductor Models of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Theoretical analysis of intracortical microelectrode recordings , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[36]  M. Moffitt,et al.  Model-based analysis of cortical recording with silicon microelectrodes , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Alan D Dorval,et al.  Stimulus features underlying reduced tremor suppression with temporally patterned deep brain stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Bayford,et al.  Quantifying the effects of the electrode–brain interface on the crossing electric currents in deep brain recording and stimulation , 2008, Neuroscience.

[39]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  Alexander R. Kent,et al.  Characterization of Evoked Potentials During Deep Brain Stimulation in the Thalamus , 2013 .

[41]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Dendritic Low-Threshold Calcium Currents in Thalamic Relay Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  G. Fink,et al.  Essential tremor and tremor in Parkinson's disease are associated with distinct ‘tremor clusters’ in the ventral thalamus , 2012, Experimental Neurology.

[43]  A. Lozano,et al.  Advances in neurostimulation for movement disorders , 2000, Neurological research.

[44]  Peng Cong,et al.  Design and Validation of a Fully Implantable, Chronic, Closed-Loop Neuromodulation Device With Concurrent Sensing and Stimulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[45]  Antonio Oliviero,et al.  Effects of stimulation of the subthalamic area on oscillatory pallidal activity in Parkinson's disease , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[46]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Enhanced synchronization of thalamic theta band local field potentials in patients with essential tremor , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[47]  C. Bédard,et al.  Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials in brain tissue. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  T. Hirai,et al.  Cytometric analysis of the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus in humans. , 1989, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[50]  Mandy Miller Koop,et al.  Intra-operative STN DBS attenuates the prominent beta rhythm in the STN in Parkinson's disease , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[51]  Xuefeng F. Wei,et al.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.