The roles of syllables and phonemes during phonological encoding in Chinese spoken word production: A topographic ERP study

[1]  M. Damian,et al.  Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. , 2019, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Qingfang Zhang,et al.  Syllables are Retrieved before Segments in the Spoken Production of Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Study , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Syllabic encoding during overt speech production in Cantonese: Evidence from temporal brain responses , 2016, Brain Research.

[5]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2015, Brain and Language.

[7]  L. Mo,et al.  The Role of Phoneme in Mandarin Chinese Production: Evidence from ERPs , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Gary S Dell,et al.  ‘hotdog’, not ‘hot’ ‘dog’: the phonological planning of compound words , 2014, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[9]  Maria Stein,et al.  A Tutorial on Data-Driven Methods for Statistically Assessing ERP Topographies , 2013, Brain Topography.

[10]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  The Proximate Phonological Unit of Chinese-English Bilinguals: Proficiency Matters , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Phonological Units in Spoken Word Production: Insights from Cantonese , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system? , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  Masked Syllable Priming Effects in Word and Picture Naming in Chinese , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[16]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  The functional unit of Japanese word naming: evidence from masked priming. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Maria Stein,et al.  Ragu: A Free Tool for the Analysis of EEG and MEG Event-Related Scalp Field Data Using Global Randomization Statistics , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[18]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[19]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  J. Grainger,et al.  ERP Evidence for Ultra-Fast Semantic Processing in the Picture–Word Interference Paradigm , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[21]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English , 2010, Cognition.

[22]  Albert Costa,et al.  The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Andus Wing-Kuen Wong,et al.  What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Toward a Language-General Account of Word Production: The Proximate Units Principle. , 2009, CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). Conference.

[25]  N. Dumay,et al.  Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments , 2009 .

[26]  Andus Wing-Kuen Wong,et al.  Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Z. Qingfang.  Phonological Encoding in Monosyllabic and Bisyllabic Mandarin Word Production: Implicit Priming Paradigm Study , 2008 .

[28]  Denis Brunet,et al.  Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review , 2008, Brain Topography.

[29]  et al.,et al.  Spatial patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, identified via high-dimensional pattern classification, predict subsequent cognitive decline , 2008, NeuroImage.

[30]  N. Schiller.  The masked onset priming effect in picture naming , 2008, Cognition.

[31]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production , 2007 .

[33]  S. Kinoshita,et al.  Masked onset priming effect for high-frequency words: Further support for the speech-planning account , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Johannes C. Ziegler,et al.  The role of orthography in speech production revisited , 2007, Cognition.

[35]  Takao Fushimi,et al.  The functional unit in phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[38]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm , 2003 .

[39]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Masked Priming of the Syllable in Mandarin Chinese Speech Production , 2003 .

[40]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Word-Form Encoding in Mandarin Chinese as Assessed by the Implicit , 2002 .

[41]  A. Woollams,et al.  The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[42]  S. Morand,et al.  Electric source imaging of human brain functions , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[43]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Mandarin Chinese , 2000 .

[45]  N. Schiller.  Single word production in english: the role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Resampling-based false discovery rate controlling multiple test procedures for correlated test statistics , 1999 .

[47]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Masked Syllable Priming of English Nouns , 1999, Brain and Language.

[48]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[50]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures , 1998 .

[51]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[52]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[53]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[54]  D. Guthrie,et al.  Significance testing of difference potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[55]  A. Meyer.  The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[56]  Chris Davis,et al.  The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: interference effects from a masked prime , 1991 .

[57]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[58]  Nicholas Gaspelin,et al.  How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[59]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Processing segmental and prosodic information in spoken word planning: Further evidence from Cantonese Chinese , 2015 .

[60]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  Constructing initial phonology in Mandarin Chinese: Syllabic or subsyllabic? A masked priming investigation , 2015 .

[61]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese , 2015 .

[62]  Itaru F. Tatsumi,et al.  Orthographic influences on the word‐onset phoneme preparation effect in native Japanese speakers: Evidence from the word‐form preparation paradigm , 2015 .

[63]  Zhang Qing.  Phonological Encoding in Monosyllabic and Bisyllabic Mandarin Word Production:Implicit Priming Paradigm Study , 2008 .

[64]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[65]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[66]  Colin Yallop,et al.  An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology , 1990 .