Optimising reproducibility in low quality signals without smoothing; an alternative paradigm for signal processing

Raman spectroscopy has been revolutionised in recent decades by major technological advances such as lasers, charge-coupled detectors (CCD) and notch/edge filters. In contrast the development of signal processing algorithms has progressed at a slower pace. Spectroscopic applications increasingly focus on ‘real-world’ applications that are not under highly controlled conditions and with more stringent limitations placed on acquisition conditions (e.g. low power for in vivo and explosives analysis). Often it is necessary to work with signals of a quality traditionally considered poor. In this study an alternative paradigm for signal processing poor quality signals is presented and rigorously assessed. Instead of estimating the background on the individual signals it is estimated on the results of a multivariate analysis. Under this paradigm prediction reproducibility is unaffected by the signal processing, unlike the traditional paradigm of correcting individual signals which induces errors that propagate through to the prediction. The paradigms were tested on a ‘real-world’ dataset to predict the concentration of a pathologically relevant protein modification, carboxymethyl lysine (CML). Use of the new paradigm allowed signals with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 2.4 to give a prediction with variance just 8.7% of the mean, with the traditional paradigm giving a variance of over 140% of the mean. Significant improvement in reproducibility could even be observed with signals as good as SNR 85. The ability to obtain reproducible predictions from low quality signals allows shorter acquisition (e.g. mapping or on-line analysis), use of low powers (in vivo diagnostics, hazardous materials analysis (HAZMAT)) or use of cheaper equipment. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Y. Chikishev,et al.  Optimization of the Rolling-Circle Filter for Raman Background Subtraction , 2006, Applied spectroscopy.

[2]  A. Pawlak,et al.  Advanced Glycation as a Basis for Understanding Retinal Aging and Noninvasive Risk Prediction , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Beattie,et al.  Effect of excitation wavelength on the Raman spectroscopy of the porcine photoreceptor layer from the area centralis. , 2005, Molecular vision.

[4]  Andrew Jirasek,et al.  Investigation of Selected Baseline Removal Techniques as Candidates for Automated Implementation , 2005, Applied spectroscopy.

[5]  J Greve,et al.  Nonresonant confocal Raman imaging of DNA and protein distribution in apoptotic cells. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[6]  L. Farmer,et al.  Preliminary investigation of the application of Raman spectroscopy to the prediction of the sensory quality of beef silverside. , 2004, Meat science.

[7]  A. Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Automated Method for Subtraction of Fluorescence from Biological Raman Spectra , 2003, Applied spectroscopy.

[8]  Wei Li,et al.  A background elimination method based on wavelet transform for Raman spectra , 2007 .

[9]  J. Renwick Beattie,et al.  A critical evaluation of Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of lipids: Fatty acid methyl esters , 2004, Lipids.

[10]  A Jirasek,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Manual Baseline Determination , 2004, Applied spectroscopy.

[11]  Pavel Matousek,et al.  Efficient Rejection of Fluorescence from Raman Spectra Using Picosecond Kerr Gating , 1999 .

[12]  Martin J. Snowden,et al.  A comparison of Raman chemical images produced by univariate and multivariate data processing—a simulation with an example from pharmaceutical practice , 2004 .

[13]  Yi-Zeng Liang,et al.  An intelligent background-correction algorithm for highly fluorescent samples in Raman spectroscopy , 2010 .

[14]  R. McCreery,et al.  Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis: McCreery/Raman Spectroscopy , 2005 .

[15]  Don Clark,et al.  Chemical images: Technical approaches and issues , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[16]  Alan G. Ryder,et al.  Comparison of Derivative Preprocessing and Automated Polynomial Baseline Correction Method for Classification and Quantification of Narcotics in Solid Mixtures , 2006, Applied spectroscopy.

[17]  M. Boulton,et al.  Confocal Raman microscopy can quantify advanced glycation end product (AGE) modifications in Bruch's membrane leading to accurate, nondestructive prediction of ocular aging , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[18]  Steven E. J. Bell,et al.  Analysis of luminescent samples using subtracted shifted Raman spectroscopy , 1998 .

[19]  John J. McGarvey,et al.  Effect of signal intensity normalization on the multivariate analysis of spectral data in complex `real-world' datasets , 2009 .

[20]  John J. McGarvey,et al.  Raman microscopy of porcine inner retinal layers from the area centralis , 2007, Molecular vision.

[21]  P. White,et al.  ITERATIVE SVD METHOD FOR NOISE REDUCTION OF LOW-DIMENSIONAL CHAOTIC TIME SERIES , 1999 .

[22]  Anna Pawlak,et al.  Raman spectroscopy of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), possible markers for progressive retinal dysfunction , 2008 .

[23]  Jan J. Gerbrands,et al.  On the relationships between SVD, KLT and PCA , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  Slobodan Sasić,et al.  Defining a Strategy for Chemical Imaging of Industrial Pharmaceutical Samples on Raman Line-Mapping and Global Illumination Instruments , 2006, Applied spectroscopy.