Evaluation of a 3D Viscous Code for Turbomachinery Flows

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFI)) codes play an increasingly important role in the design and development of nirbomachinery for modern gas turbine engines. As a result additional emphasis is being placed on the evaluation of the codes to ensure that they are working correctly and to indicate the accuracy which is likely to be achieved in practice. At DERA a programme of work has been carried out to evaluate the TRANSCode 3D viscous flow code, which was developed from the BTOB3D solver written by Dawes in 1986. A three part strategy for the validation and calibration of the code was adopted, covering comparisons with boundary layer test cases, Q3D compressor cascades and full 3D cases. The results indicated that the grids currently employed for turbomachinery flows limit the accuracy achieved for cases where there is significant laminar flow. For turbulent flows the Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model gives reasonably accurate results for 2D flows in near equilibrium, but it is less satisfactory for more complex flows, when the concept of a simple 2D boundary layer does not apply, and for strong shock wave/boundary layer interactions. Overall it is considered that the code is a valuable tool for turbomachinery analysis and design, but solutions must be assessed with care. Alternative turbulence models and other developments are being pursued for future versions of the code.

[1]  J. J. Adamczyk,et al.  The Effect of Hub Leakage Flow on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors , 1997 .

[2]  Paul R. Emmerson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Flow Calculations of the Stator in a Highly Loaded Transonic Fan , 1996 .

[3]  Andrea Arnone,et al.  Viscous Analysis of Three-Dimensional Rotor Flow Using a Multigrid Method , 1993 .

[4]  R. J. Boyle,et al.  An algebraic turbulence model for three-dimensional viscous flows , 1993 .

[5]  Mark G. Turner,et al.  Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Computations of Transonic Fan Flow Using an Explicit Flow Solver and an Implicit κ–ϵ Solver , 1992 .

[6]  Rodrick V. Chima,et al.  Viscous three-dimensional calculations of transonic fan performance , 1992 .

[7]  H. Starken,et al.  An Investigation of a Strong Shock-Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction in a Supersonic Compressor Cascade , 1991 .

[8]  W. J. Calvert,et al.  Application of S1BYL2 to the AGARD WG18 Compressor Test Cases , 1991 .

[9]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Validation of a multigrid method for the Reynolds averaged equations , 1988 .

[10]  William N. Dawes,et al.  A Numerical Method for the Analysis of 3D Viscous Compressible Flow in Turbine Cascades: Application to Secondary Flow Development in a Cascade With and Without Dihedral , 1986 .

[11]  A. Jameson,et al.  Some recent developments in numerical methods for transonic flows , 1985 .

[12]  K. D. Papailiou,et al.  Study of Secondary Flows in Blade Cascades of Turbomachines , 1982 .

[13]  Robert P. Lohmann,et al.  The Response of a Developed Turbulent Boundary Layer to Local Transverse Surface Motion , 1976 .

[14]  H. Schreiber Shock-Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction in a Highly Loaded Transonic Fan Blade Cascade , 1995 .

[15]  H. Hoheisel,et al.  Test Cases for Computation of Internal Flows in Aero Engine Components: Test Case E/CA-6 Subsonic Turbine Cascade T106. , 1990 .

[16]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .