PREDICTING FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA LEVELS IN THE CHARLES RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS, USA 1

: In Massachusetts, the Charles River Watershed Association conducts a regular water quality monitoring and public notification program in the Charles River Basin during the recreational season to inform users of the river's health. This program has relied on laboratory analyses of river samples for fecal coliform bacteria levels, however, results are not available until at least 24 hours after sampling. To avoid the need for laboratory analyses, ordinary least squares (OLS) and logistic regression models were developed to predict fecal coliform bacteria concentrations and the probabilities of exceeding the Massachusetts secondary contact recreation standard for bacteria based on meteorological conditions and streamflow. The OLS models resulted in adjusted R2s ranging from 50 to 60 percent. An uncertainty analysis reveals that of the total variability of fecal coliform bacteria concentrations, 45 percent is explained by the OLS regression model, 15 percent is explained by both measurement and space sampling error, and 40 percent is explained by time sampling error. Higher accuracy in future bacteria forecasting models would likely result from reductions in laboratory measurement errors and improved sampling designs.

[1]  Martin T. Auer,et al.  Modeling fecal coliform bacteria—I. Field and laboratory determination of loss kinetics , 1993 .

[2]  D Kay,et al.  Relationships between microbial water quality and environmental conditions in coastal recreational waters: the Fylde coast, UK. , 2001, Water research.

[3]  M. Mallin,et al.  EFFECT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ON BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER QUALITY IN COASTAL WATERSHEDS , 2000 .

[4]  D. Porter,et al.  Using geographic information systems and regression analysis to evaluate relationships between land use and fecal coliform bacterial pollution , 2004 .

[5]  D. Helsel,et al.  Statistical methods in water resources , 2020, Techniques and Methods.

[6]  Douglas J. Norton,et al.  UTILIZATION OF LANDSCAPE INDICATORS TO MODEL POTENTIAL PATHOGEN IMPAIRED WATERS 1 , 2001 .

[7]  Edward L. Thackston,et al.  Housing Density and Bacterial Loading in Urban Streams , 1999 .

[8]  D. Myers,et al.  Effects of hydrologic, biological, and environmental processes on sources and concentrations of fecal bacteria in the Cuyahoga River, with implications for management of recreational waters in Summit and Cuyahoga Counties, Ohio , 1998 .

[9]  Patrick P. Rasmussen,et al.  Comparison and continuous estimates of fecal coliform and Escherichia coli bacteria in selected Kansas streams, May 1999 through April 2002 , 2003 .

[10]  Robert M. Hirsch.  Statistical Methods and Sampling Design for Estimating Step Trends in Surface-Water Quality , 1988 .

[11]  Nicholas J. Ashbolt,et al.  Relationships between indicators, pathogens and water quality in an estuarine system , 1996 .

[12]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Nondetects and data analysis : statistics for censored environmental data , 2004 .

[13]  Donna S. Francy,et al.  Escherichia coli at Ohio Bathing Beaches—Distribution, Sources, Wastewater Indicators, and Predictive Modeling , 2003 .

[14]  Andrew C. Ziegler,et al.  Regression analysis and real-time water-quality monitoring to estimate constituent concentrations, loads, and yields in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1995-99 , 2000 .

[15]  J. Norris,et al.  Occurrence of fecal coliform bacteria in selected streams in Wyoming, 1990-99 , 2000 .

[16]  Adrian McDonald,et al.  Enteric bacterial concentrations in reservoir feeder streams: baseflow characteristics and response to hydrograph events , 1981 .

[17]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Occurrence and Distribution of Microbiological Indicators in Groundwater and Stream Water , 2000 .