Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill.

Several theories assume that practice (a) results in restructuring of component processes and (b) reduces demand on working memory. Eight subjects practiced judgments about digital logic gates for over 8,000 trials. At two practice levels, subjects made judgments while retaining short-term memory loads irrelevant to the judgments, relevant but not accessed, or accessed to make the judgments. Four phenomena together provide constraints for theory: First, performance declined in moving from blocked practice to randomized practice. Second, gate and judgment type strongly affected latency. Third, these effects declined but did not disappear with practice. Fourth, the cost of accessing information in working memory remained substantial. These results are interpreted as reflecting a serial pro-cess with constant structure, while component processes become faster. The results challenge theories assuming that all learning results from restructuring or that restructuring is an automatic consequence of practice, and they support a distributed view of working memory. Several current theories of skill acquisition (e.g., Anderson, 1982, 1983, 1987; Rosenbloom & Newell, 1987) share the assumptions that (a) practice results in the reorganization or r£rtrwc/un/7# of component processes, and (b) practice reduces the load on a working memory that serves as a single workspace for carrying out cognitive processes. In the study reported here, we observed the acquisition of procedural skill for judgments about causal rules over the course of approximately 20 hr (over 8,000 trials) of practice. The results challenge the above assumptions and suggest an alternative view in which the organization of component processes and use of working memory remain constant while the speed of component processes increases (and attentional load decreases) with extended practice (see Schneider, 1985).

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[3]  G. Hitch The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[5]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[6]  G. Logan Short-Term Memory Demands of Reaction-Time Tasks That Differ in Complexity , 1980 .

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge Compilation: Mechanisms for the Automatization of Cognitive Skills. , 1980 .

[8]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[9]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[10]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[11]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Short-term memory does not involve the "working memory" of information processing: The demise of a common assumption , 1983 .

[12]  R. Magill,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition i , 2022 .

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Solutions. , 1987 .

[14]  P. Langley,et al.  Production system models of learning and development , 1987 .

[15]  Allen Newell,et al.  Learning by chunking: a production system model of practice , 1987 .

[16]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  A Connectionist/Control Architecture for Working Memory , 1988 .