Supporting Learning Engagement with Online Students

University students are increasingly demanding that traditionally taught courses are converted to an online platform. While quality standards are in place for the format and organization of online courses, professors often are left wondering what activities contribute to learning engagement for their online students. The research question driving this study was, what activities contribute to learning engagement for online students? To investigate this question, an online survey was conducted in one state university of all students taking an online course during the spring semester. With responses from 417 students and using three standardized scale variables for learning engagement, as well as two open-ended questions, course components related to strong learning engagement were identified and examined. Initial findings indicated a statistically significant moderate correlation of learning engagement with the use of higher-order learning and reflective and integrative learning techniques. Specifically, students who reported being highly engaged connected ideas from other courses, changed their understanding of a topic or concept, found connections between their learning and societal problems, and had fun. A regression model using these variables, along with control variables of student age, gender, and out-of-school work, resulted in an R2 of 0.484, suggesting that almost half of the variance in learning engagement can be explained via this model. Further analysis of the qualitative data identified certain aspects of online discussions and assignments as engaging, such as discussions and interactive assignments that are not merely “fun” from a student perspective but also integrate previous learning and connect to current social issues. This includes prompting students with thought-provoking questions that relate to “real-world” situations and inviting students to share diverse opinions as well as develop personal perspectives.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  Gary Natriello,et al.  Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education , 1985 .

[3]  Revisited Alexander Astin What Matters in College: Four Critical Years , 1993 .

[4]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded Theory in Practice , 1997 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[8]  Thierry Volery,et al.  Critical success factors in online education , 2000 .

[9]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  Promoting Deep and Durable Learning in the Online Classroom , 2000 .

[10]  N. Blake,et al.  Tutors and Students without Faces or Places , 2000 .

[11]  Distance Learning: Education or Economics? , 2001 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[13]  Richard Thomas Bothel,et al.  Epilogue: A cautionary note about on‐line assessment , 2002 .

[14]  George D. Kuh What We're Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices , 2003 .

[15]  Adam D. Fein,et al.  Preparing instructors for online instruction , 2003 .

[16]  Elena Barberà Quality in virtual education environments , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[18]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[19]  S. Baglione,et al.  The Superiority of Online Discussion: Faculty Perceptions , 2007 .

[20]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Arleen R. Bejerano The Genesis and Evolution of Online Degree Programs: Who Are They For and What Have We Lost Along The Way? , 2008 .

[23]  C. C. Robinson,et al.  New Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning , 2008 .

[24]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning , 2008 .

[25]  Wanda Bonnel,et al.  Improving Feedback to Students in Online Courses , 2008, Nursing education perspectives.

[26]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[27]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Prioritization of online instructor roles: implications for competency‐based teacher education programs , 2009 .

[28]  Marcia D. Dixson Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? , 2010 .

[29]  Janet L. Lear,et al.  Interactivity/Community Process Model for the Online Education Environment , 2010 .

[30]  Pam Jones DeLotell,et al.  The Use Of Deep Learning Strategies In Online Business Courses To Impact Student Retention , 2010 .

[31]  Michelle S. Schroeder-Moreno,et al.  Enhancing Active and Interactive Learning Online - Lessons Learned from an Online Introductory Agroecology Course , 2010 .

[32]  Julian Robinson,et al.  Assessing the value of using an online discussion board for engaging students , 2011 .

[33]  Jennifer Richardson,et al.  INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION IN ONLINE LEARNING: EXPERIENCED ONLINE INSTRUCTORS' PERCEPTIONS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS , 2012 .

[34]  Betul Czerkawski,et al.  Designing Deeper Learning Experiences for Online Instruction. , 2014 .

[35]  Stephanie B. King Graduate Student Perceptions of the Use of Online Course Tools to Support Engagement , 2014 .

[36]  William J. Fear,et al.  Good Quality Discussion Is Necessary but Not Sufficient in Asynchronous Tuition: A Brief Narrative Review of the Literature. , 2014 .

[37]  Lane Whitney Clarke,et al.  Digging beneath the Surface: Analyzing the Complexity of Instructors' Participation in Asynchronous Discussion. , 2014 .

[38]  Marcia D. Dixson Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). , 2015 .

[39]  Independent Colleges and Student Engagement: Descriptive Analysis by Institutional Type. A 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Special Analysis for the Council of Independent Colleges. , 2015 .

[40]  Cass M. Johnson Rethinking online discourse: Improving learning through discussions in the online classroom , 2015, Education and Information Technologies.

[41]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2016 .

[42]  L. Pagliari,et al.  Factors for Successful Evolution and Sustainability of Quality Distance Education , 2016 .

[43]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[44]  Ethics and social justice: A review of theoretical frameworks and pedagogical considerations. , 2017 .

[45]  Julia E. Seaman,et al.  Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. , 2018 .

[46]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE STUDENTS’ DECISION TO DROPOUT OF ONLINE COURSES , 2019, Online Learning.

[47]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT , 2019, Online Learning.