Estimating Cost Savings when Implementing a Product Platform Approach

Many market forces are driving companies to improve their targeting of increasingly small market niches. To accomplish this efficiently, products are organized into product families that typically share common platforms. To reorganize the current product offerings or new products into a product family, using a platform approach, requires estimating the savings for such a modification. One of the problems encountered in estimating development and design cost is the lack of availability of hard information during the initial design phases. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the design and development cost, when moving towards a platform approach, using simple models. The activity based product family cost models are developed from existing single product design activities, which are modified and extended to reflect activities related to development of product platform and subsequent product family members supported by the platform. Uncertainty related to cost associated with activities are included in the model, which is solved using Monte Carlo simulation. The approach is demonstrated using a hard disk drive spindle motor platform development for a family of hard disks.

[1]  M. Meyer,et al.  Revitalize Your Product Lines Through Continuous Platform Renewal , 1997 .

[2]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Fast-Cycle Capability for Competitive Power , 1988 .

[3]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[4]  David A. Collier,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT AND OPERATING BENEFITS OF COMPONENT PART COMMONALITY , 1981 .

[5]  P. C. Stadzisz,et al.  Integrated design of product families and assembly systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Web Grammars , 1969, IJCAI.

[7]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Modularity and the independence of functional requirements in designing complex systems , 1994 .

[8]  K. R. Baker.  Safety stocks and component commonality , 1985 .

[9]  Hector H. Guerrero,et al.  The effect of various production strategies on product structures with commonality , 1985 .

[10]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Metrics for Managing Research and Development in the Context of the Product Family , 1997 .

[11]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model , 1986 .

[12]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[13]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation , 1997 .

[14]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  DESIGNING PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES FOR POSTPONEMENT , 1994 .

[15]  M. Mcgrath.  Product Strategy for High Technology Companies , 2000 .

[16]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Product Family Configuration Reasoning Using Discrete Design Spaces , 2000 .

[17]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study , 1996 .

[18]  D. Collier.  Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality , 1982 .

[19]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .