Shared generative rules of locomotor behavior in arthropods and vertebrates

The discovery of shared behavioral processes across phyla is an essential step in the establishment of a comparative study of behavior. We use immobility as an origin and reference for the measurement of locomotor behavior; speed, direction of walking and direction of facing as the three degrees of freedom shaping fly locomotor behavior; and cocaine as the parameter inducing a progressive transition in and out of immobility. In this way we expose and quantify the generative rules that shape part of fruit fly locomotor behavior, bringing about a gradual buildup of freedom during the transition from immobility to normal behavior and a precisely opposite narrowing down during the transition into immobility. During buildup the fly exhibits enhancement and then reduction to normal values of movement along each degree of freedom: first, body rotation in the horizontal plane, then path curvature and then speed of translation. Transition into immobility unfolds by narrowing down of the repertoire in the opposite sequential order, showing reciprocal relations during both buildup and narrowing down. The same generative rules apply to vertebrate locomotor behavior in a variety of contexts involving transition out and into immobility. Recent claims for deep homology between the arthropod central complex and the vertebrate basal ganglia provide an opportunity to examine whether the generative rules we discovered also share common descent. Neurochemical processes mediating the buildup of locomotor behavior in vertebrates could guide the search for equivalent processes in arthropods. The measurement methodology we use prompts the discovery of candidate behavioral homologies. Significance Statement Do flies and mice share the same behavior? By defining immobility as an intrinsic reference point for locomotor behavior we show that the rules that generate the transition from immobility to full blown normal behavior, and from full blown behavior to immobility are shared by fruit flies and mice. These rules constitute a much desired aim of evolutionary biology: the discovery of behavioral homologies across distant phyla. The methodology we use facilitates the discovery of cross-phyletic behavioral homologies, shedding light on the problem of the evolution of behavior.

[1]  Joseph J. Paton,et al.  Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Alex Gomez-Marin,et al.  Multilevel control of run orientation in Drosophila larval chemotaxis , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  The Angular Interval between the Direction of Progression and Body Orientation in Normal, Alcohol- and Cocaine Treated Fruit Flies , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  A. R. Cools,et al.  Spiraling dopaminergic circuitry from the ventral striatum to dorsal striatum is an effective feed-forward loop , 2013, Neuroscience.

[5]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Deep Homology of Arthropod Central Complex and Vertebrate Basal Ganglia , 2013, Science.

[6]  Greg J. Stephens,et al.  Automated Tracking of Animal Posture and Movement during Exploration and Sensory Orientation Behaviors , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Ilan Golani,et al.  The developmental dynamics of behavioral growth processes in rodent egocentric and allocentric space , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  A. Gomez-Marin,et al.  Active sampling and decision making in Drosophila chemotaxis , 2011, Nature communications.

[9]  Ilan Golani,et al.  Superiority and Inferiority: a Morphological Analysis of Free and Stimulus Bound Behaviour in Honey Badger (Mellivora capensis) Interactions , 2010 .

[10]  Ilan Golani,et al.  Knots: Attractive Places with High Path Tortuosity in Mouse Open Field Exploration , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Kazushi Yoshida,et al.  Parallel Use of Two Behavioral Mechanisms for Chemotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  P. Mitra,et al.  Analysis of the Trajectory of Drosophila melanogaster in a Circular Open Field Arena , 2007, PloS one.

[13]  G. Elmer,et al.  Texture of locomotor path: a replicable characterization of a complex behavioral phenotype , 2005, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[14]  M. Suster,et al.  Turning behavior in Drosophila larvae: a role for the small scribbler transcript , 2004, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[15]  Anat Sakov,et al.  The dynamics of spatial behavior: how can robust smoothing techniques help? , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Coordination of side-to-side head movements and walking in amphetamine-treated rats: a stereotyped motor pattern as a stable equilibrium in a dynamical system , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Drugs, flies, and videotape: the effects of ethanol and cocaine on Drosophila locomotion , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Abnormal turning behavior in Drosophila larvae. Identification and molecular analysis of scribbler (sbb). , 2000, Genetics.

[19]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Dopamine modulates acute responses to cocaine, nicotine and ethanol in Drosophila , 2000, Current Biology.

[20]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Central complex substructures are required for the maintenance of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Jay Hirsh,et al.  Stereotypic behavioral responses to free-base cocaine and the development of behavioral sensitization in Drosophila , 1998, Current Biology.

[22]  P. Teitelbaum,et al.  Keeping the Body Straight in the Unconstrained Locomotion of Normal and Dopamine-Stimulant-Treated Rats. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  B. Goodwin Homology and a generative theory of biological form , 1993 .

[24]  R. C. Eaton Eshkol-Wachman movement notation and the evolution of locomotor patterns in vertebrates , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  A. Cools Striatal structures, dopamine and the mobility gradient model , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  I. Golani A mobility gradient in the organization of vertebrate movement: The perception of movement through symbolic language , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  I. Golani The natural geometry of a behavioral homology , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Ilan Golani,et al.  The description of rat drug-induced behavior: Kinematics versus response categories , 1991, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  W. J. Bell Searching Behavior Patterns in Insects , 1990 .

[30]  A. Kelley,et al.  Amphetamine microinjections into distinct striatal subregions cause dissociable effects on motor and ingestive behavior , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  N. Swerdlow,et al.  Norepinephrine Stimulates behavioral activation in rats following depletion of nucleus accumbens dopamine , 1989, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[32]  David Eilam,et al.  D2-agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements , 1989, Brain Research.

[33]  G. Wagner The Biological Homology Concept , 1989 .

[34]  D. Eilam,et al.  The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in the house rat (Rattus rattus): the mobility gradient. , 1988, Developmental psychobiology.

[35]  P. Teitelbaum,et al.  The morphogenesis of stereotyped behavior induced by the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in the laboratory rat , 1985, Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Solomon,et al.  Microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen differentially affect stereotypy and locomotion in the rat , 1984 .

[37]  J. Pollard Evolutionary theory : paths into the future , 1984 .

[38]  I. Golani,et al.  A Motility-Immobility Gradient in the Behavior of the "Inferior" Wolf during "Ritualized Fighting" , 1983 .

[39]  Devra G. Kleiman,et al.  Advances in the study of mammalian behavior , 1983 .

[40]  P. Teitelbaum,et al.  "Warm-up" along dimensions of movement in the ontogeny of exploration in rats and other infant mammals. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Ilan Golani,et al.  A proposed natural geometry of recovery from akinesia in the lateral hypothalamic rat , 1979, Brain Research.

[42]  E. Dorinda Loeffel,et al.  The Hungry Fly: A Physiological Study of the Behavior Associated With Feeding , 1977 .

[43]  K. E. Moore,et al.  Mesolimbic dopaminergic neurones in the rotational model of nigrostriatal function , 1976, Nature.

[44]  S. Iversen,et al.  Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum , 1975, Brain Research.

[45]  W. T. Powers Behavior, the control of perception , 1973 .

[46]  D. Svoboda,et al.  MICROBODIES IN EXPERIMENTALLY ALTERED CELLS , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  D. Lehrman,et al.  A Critique of Konrad Lorenz's Theory of Instinctive Behavior , 1953, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[48]  H. H. Swinnerton Development and Evolution , 1938, Nature.

[49]  G. E. Coghill,et al.  Anatomy and the Problem of Behaviour , 1929, Nature.

[50]  E. Tolman The nature of instinct. , 1923 .

[51]  Isidore Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire Principes de philosophie zoologique, discutés en mars 1830, au sein de l'Académie Royale des Sciences , 1830 .

[52]  Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire,et al.  Principes de philosophie zoologique , 2022 .