Italian and Australian Local Governments: Balanced Scorecard Practices – A Research Note

Purpose – New public management changes in both the Australian and Italian government sectors have affected their modus operandi. This research aims to illustrate how the balanced scorecard (BSC) has been used in both Italian and Australian local government organisations (LGO), focusing on implementation and practice.Design/methodology/approach – A case study method is applied which was chosen to illustrate the use of the BSC model in both an Australian and an Italian LGO. These specific organisations were chosen as the authors are familiar with their experiments with the BSC.Findings – The main finding was that the BSC was used internally in both the Italian and Australian cases and little material was used for an external accountability reporting technology.Research limitations/implications – The analysis is limited to two LGOs locations, thus no generalisation can be implied.Originality/value – Few studies have reviewed, in the public sector, BSC practices, particularly for local governments.

[1]  Russell Kenley,et al.  A service delivery approach to measuring facility performance in local government , 2002 .

[2]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[3]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorising and Some New Ways Forward , 1999 .

[4]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[6]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  The role for empirical research in management accounting , 1986 .

[7]  Mark Considine,et al.  Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work , 2001 .

[8]  Federica Farneti.  Balanced scorecard implementation in an Italian local government organization , 2009 .

[9]  John Martin,et al.  Local Government Accountability: Explaining Differences , 2001 .

[10]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[11]  Jones,et al.  International Public Financial Management Reform: Progress, Contradictions, and Challenges , 2005 .

[12]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2003 .

[13]  A. Goddard,et al.  Performance, Strategy and Accounting in Local Government and Higher Education in the UK , 2007 .

[14]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[15]  M. Ezzamel,et al.  Comprehensive and incremental budgeting in education: the construction and management of formula funding in three English local education authorities , 1996 .

[16]  Jane Broadbent,et al.  If You Can't Measure It, How Can You Manage It? Management and Governance in Higher Educational Institutions , 2007 .

[17]  John Martin,et al.  Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government , 2000 .

[18]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Multiple integrated performance management systems: IC and BSC in a software company , 2002 .

[19]  Nigel King,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 1994 .

[20]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[21]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[22]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[23]  D. W. Young,et al.  A contingency approach to managing outsourcing risk in municipalities , 2008 .