Sonorancy and geminacy

This paper establishes the claim that geminate sonorants are cross-linguistically marked, and furthermore, that the relative sonority of a geminate positively correlates with its markedness, i.e., the universal ranking *GEMGLIDE » *GEMLIQUID » *GEMNASAL holds. This ranking is supported by a cross-linguistic survey of geminate inventories (Podesva 2002; Taylor 1985) as well as by a number of phonological alternations. Second, this paper proposes that this markedness hierarchy derives from the confusability of geminacy contrasts for sonorant segments: the more sonorous a segment is, the more difficult it is to perceive its segmental duration, and hence the less perceptible its geminacy contrasts are. A perceptual experiment on Arabic is reported to support this proposal, which shows that discriminability of geminacy contrasts negatively correlates with relative sonority. The results add to a growing body of literature that claims that languages avoid making a phonological contrast that is not very perceptible, as in Adaptive Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995; Liljencrants and Lindblom 1972; Padgett 2003) and Licensing-by-Cue (Steriade 1997).

[1]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns , 2004 .

[2]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  The evolution of metathesis , 2004 .

[3]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[4]  L. R. Decker,et al.  Time Factors in Perception of A Double Consonant , 1960 .

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Manfred Mayrhofer,et al.  A Sanskrit Grammar , 1972 .

[7]  D. T. Cole,et al.  Some features of Ganda linguistic structure , 1965 .

[8]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[9]  Jeri J. Jaeger.  Speech Aerodynamics and Phonological Universals , 1978 .

[10]  Astrid Kraehenmann,et al.  Swiss German stops: geminates all over the word , 2001, Phonology.

[11]  Jacques Koreman,et al.  Perception of consonant length: voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali , 1989 .

[12]  D. Steriade.  Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization , 1999 .

[13]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[14]  Aditi Lahiri,et al.  The timing of geminate consonants , 1988 .

[15]  Astrid Kraehenmann,et al.  Quantity and Prosodic Asymmetries in Alemannic: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives , 2003 .

[16]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[17]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[18]  George N. Clements,et al.  3. Compensatory Lengthening and Consonant Gemination in LuGanda , 1986 .

[19]  J. Goldsmith.  Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 1990 .

[20]  黒田 成幸.  Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language , 1965 .

[21]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian , 2003 .

[22]  Maria Gouskova,et al.  Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: the case of syllable contact , 2004, Phonology.

[23]  K. Norlin.  A phonetic study of emphasis and vowels in Egyptian Arabic , 1987 .

[24]  D. Steriade.  Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification , 1982 .

[25]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  The Indeterminacy/Attestation Model of Metathesis , 2004 .

[26]  Tara Mohanan,et al.  Syllable Structure in Malayalam , 1989 .

[27]  Carole Paradis.  Lexical phonology and morphology : the nominal classes in Fula , 1994 .

[28]  Dean H. Obrecht.  Three Experiments in the Perception of Geminate Consonants in Arabic , 1965 .

[29]  A. Esposito,et al.  Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[31]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Reaction Time to Synthetic Stop Consonants and Vowels at Phoneme Centers and at Phoneme Boundaries , 1963 .

[32]  Charles W. Kisseberth.  On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules , 2022 .

[33]  B. Lindblom.  Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[34]  J. Barnes.  Positional Neutralization: A Phonologization Approach to Typological Patterns , 2002 .

[35]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology: Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological Markedness , 2004 .

[36]  M. Mithun,et al.  The Phonology of Selayarese , 1986 .

[37]  Maria-Josep Solé,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[38]  Juliette Blevins.  Klamath Sibilant Degemination: Implications of a Recent Sound Change , 2004, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[39]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[40]  Paul de Lacy,et al.  Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology , 2006 .

[41]  Damian G. Sohl,et al.  Ponapean Reference Grammar , 1981 .

[42]  Goldrick Matthew,et al.  Turbid Output Representations and the Unity of Opacity , 2000 .

[43]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Speech perception in phonology , 2003 .

[44]  Y. Sagisaka,et al.  Acceptability for temporal modification of consecutive segments in isolated words. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Stephen G Parker,et al.  Quantifying the sonority hierarchy , 2002 .

[46]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  The perception of word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay , 1986, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[47]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis , 1998 .

[48]  T. Mohanan,et al.  Lexical phonology of the consonant system in Malayalam , 1984 .

[49]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[50]  Darya Kavitskaya,et al.  Compensatory Lengthening: Phonetics, Phonology, Diachrony , 2002 .

[51]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  An Effort Based Approach to Consonant Lenition , 2001 .

[52]  E. Keer,et al.  Geminates, the OCP and the Nature of CON , 1999 .

[53]  J. M. Cowan,et al.  A dictionary of modern written Arabic , 1963 .

[54]  B. Morén.  Distinctiveness, Coercion and Sonority: A Unified Theory of Weight , 2001 .

[55]  S. Crist.  Conspiracy in historical phonology , 2001 .

[56]  R. Diehl,et al.  Trading relations in speech and nonspeech , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[58]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  R. Diehl,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values , 1995 .

[60]  J. Ohala.  The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .