Familial multiple sclerosis: MRI findings in clinically affected and unaffected siblings.

Subclinical demyelinating lesions may occur in the brains of asymptomatic individuals, and the first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are at particular risk. Clinical and MRI examinations were performed in nine sibships from families with two or more cases of MS. These included 14 patients with clinically definite MS, three patients with clinically probable MS, and 27 asymptomatic siblings. Systematic criteria were applied to MRI interpretations to increase their specificity for MS. Thirteen (76%) of the 17 patients with MS showed lesions suggesting MS. Lesions were also found in six (38%) of the 16 asymptomatic siblings under age 50 and in eight (73%) of the 11 over age 50. Judged by stringent criteria, the lesions of only three (11%) of the 27 asymptomatic siblings were considered to be due to demyelination. The results demonstrate the occurrence of subclinical demyelination in asymptomatic siblings of MS patients and stress the importance of clinical follow up and MRI studies of the first-degree relatives when classifying them as healthy in family studies.

[1]  R. Rudick,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis research involving multiply affected families. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[2]  V M Haughton,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: specificity of MR for diagnosis. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  W. Smoker,et al.  MRI in familial multiple sclerosis , 1990, Neurology.

[4]  C. Polman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging studies in multiple sclerosis twins. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  E. Merelli,et al.  Diagnostic investigations in MS: which is the most sensitive? , 1989, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[6]  K. Haaland,et al.  Clinical significance of MRI white matter lesions in the elderly , 1989, Neurology.

[7]  A. Filouš.  [Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis]. , 1989, Ceskoslovenska neurologie a neurochirurgie.

[8]  H Lechner,et al.  Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis , 1988, Neurology.

[9]  L. Ketonen,et al.  A follow-up study of very low field MRI findings and clinical course in multiple sclerosis , 1988, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  A. Sadovnick,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: updated risks for relatives. , 1988, American journal of medical genetics.

[11]  A. A. Eisen,et al.  MRI in the diagnosis of MS , 1988, Neurology.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance image white matter lesions and risk factors for stroke in normal individuals. , 1988, Stroke.

[13]  M. Aisen,et al.  Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[14]  M. Aminoff,et al.  Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[15]  P. Duquette,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid findings in healthy siblings of multiple sclerosis patients , 1986, Neurology.

[16]  R. Kinkel,et al.  Correlations of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, and clinical profiles in multiple sclerosis , 1986, Neurology.

[17]  R. Siddharthan,et al.  MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Nuwer,et al.  Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[19]  S. Gilman,et al.  The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[20]  R. Martínez,et al.  Traumatic birth and syringomyelia , 1985, Neurology.

[21]  M. Ron,et al.  NMR IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND CEREBRAL VASCULAR DISEASE , 1984, The Lancet.

[22]  E. Kinnunen,et al.  The Age-Specific Prevalence Ratio of Familial Multiple Sclerosis , 1984 .

[23]  D. McFarlin,et al.  Studies of multiple sclerosis in twins , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Unsuspected multiple sclerosis. , 1983, Archives of neurology.

[25]  J. Palo,et al.  The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Finland: increase of prevalence and stability of foci in high‐risk areas , 1983, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[26]  J. G. Phadke,et al.  Atypical and clinically silent multiple sclerosis: a report of 12 cases discovered unexpectedly at necropsy. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[28]  D. McFarlin,et al.  Multiple sclerosis in twins , 1980, Neurology.

[29]  J. Palo,et al.  STUDIES ON THE CLUSTERING OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN FINLAND I: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DOMICILES AND PLACES OF BIRTH IN SELECTED SUBPOPULATIONS , 1975, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica.

[30]  R. Berry.  GENETICAL FACTORS IN THE AETIOLOGY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 1969, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[31]  R. P. Mackay,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis in Twins and Their Relatives: Final Report , 1966 .

[32]  D. Poskanzer,et al.  Familial and conjugal multiple sclerosis. , 1963, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[33]  R. P. Mackay,et al.  Multiple sclerosis in twins and their relatives. , 1966, Archives of Neurology.

[34]  R. Müller.  Genetic aspects of multiple sclerosis. , 1953, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[35]  D. Mcalpine,et al.  The familial incidence of disseminated sclerosis and its significance. , 1951, Brain : a journal of neurology.