Neural correlates related to action observation in expert archers

A growing body of evidence suggests that activity of the mirror neuron system is dependent on the observer's motor experience of a given action. It remains unclear, however, whether activity of the mirror neuron system is also associated with the observer's motor experience in sports game. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate differences in activation of the mirror neuron system during action observation between experts and non-archer control subjects. We used video of Western-style archery in which participants were asked to watch the archery movements. Hyperactivation of the premotor and inferior parietal cortex in expert archers relative to non-archer control subjects suggests that the human mirror neuron system could contain and expand representations of the motor repertoire. The fact that dorsomedial prefrontal cortex was more active in expert archers than in non-archer control subjects indicates a spontaneous engagement of theory of mind in experts when watching video of Western-style archery. Compared with the non-archer control subjects, expert archers showed greater activation in the neural system in regions associated with episodic recall from familiar and meaningful information, including the cingulate cortex, retrosplenial cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus. The results demonstrate that expertise effects stimulate brain activity not only in the mirror neuron system but also in the neural networks related to theory of mind and episodic memory.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  A. Iriki.  The neural origins and implications of imitation, mirror neurons and tool use , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[5]  E. Maguire,et al.  What does the retrosplenial cortex do? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Saxe.  Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[8]  M. Iacoboni.  Neural mechanisms of imitation , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  F. Overwalle.  Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. , 2009 .

[11]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance Volume Xix , 2001 .

[12]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[17]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. Iacoboni.  Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Keysers,et al.  Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. Decety,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[25]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[26]  R. Blair.  Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements , 2000, Neuroreport.

[28]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  The Neural Basis of Imitation is Body Part Specific , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Single-Neuron Responses in Humans during Execution and Observation of Actions , 2010, Current Biology.