Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing

Germline variants occurring in BRCA1 and BRCA2 give rise to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, predisposing to breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers marked by elevated incidences of genomic aberrations that correspond to poor prognoses. These genes are in fact involved in genetic integrity, particularly in the process of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, a high-fidelity repair system for mending DNA double-strand breaks. In addition to its implication in HBOC pathogenesis, the impairment of HR has become a prime target for therapeutic intervention utilizing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. In the present review, we introduce the molecular roles of HR orchestrated by BRCA1 and BRCA2 within the framework of sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. We examine the genetic architecture underneath breast and ovarian cancer ranging from high- and mid- to low-penetrant predisposing genes and taking into account both germline and somatic variations. Finally, we consider higher levels of complexity of the genomic landscape such as polygenic risk scores and other approaches aiming to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies for breast and ovarian cancer.

[1]  F. Couch,et al.  Saturation genome editing-based functional evaluation and clinical classification of BRCA2 single nucleotide variants , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  B. Karlan,et al.  NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024. , 2023, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[3]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense , 2023, Science.

[4]  F. Couch,et al.  BRCA1 frameshift variants leading to extended incorrect protein C termini , 2023, HGG advances.

[5]  Michelle E. Clapp,et al.  Saturation genome editing of 11 codons and exon 13 of BRCA2 coupled with chemotherapeutic drug response accurately determines pathogenicity of variants , 2023, PLoS genetics.

[6]  V. Barili,et al.  Reassessment of the NF1 variants of unknown significance found during the 20-year activity of a genetics diagnostic laboratory. , 2023, European journal of medical genetics.

[7]  Alan F. Rubin,et al.  An Atlas of Variant Effects to understand the genome at nucleotide resolution , 2023, Genome Biology.

[8]  S. Wang,et al.  Pancreatic cancer cluster region identified in BRCA2 , 2023, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[9]  J. Schuurs-Hoeijmakers,et al.  Cancer risks by sex and variant type in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. , 2022, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  H. V. Nguyen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening , 2022, BMC Cancer.

[11]  H. van Attikum,et al.  CHEK2 variants: linking functional impact to cancer risk. , 2022, Trends in cancer.

[12]  S. Kudo,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study. , 2022, The Lancet. Digital health.

[13]  J. Campbell,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening. , 2022, JAMA ophthalmology.

[14]  Martin Kircher,et al.  Predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2 , 2022, bioRxiv.

[15]  R. Eeles,et al.  Functional Analysis Identifies Damaging CHEK2 Missense Variants Associated with Increased Cancer Risk , 2021, Cancer research.

[16]  Alan F. Rubin,et al.  Closing the gap: Systematic integration of multiplexed functional data resolves variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1, TP53, and PTEN. , 2021, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  P. Fasching,et al.  Association of RAD51 with Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) and clinical outcomes in untreated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): analysis of the GeparSixto randomized clinical trial. , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  E. Eyras,et al.  Altered regulation of BRCA1 exon 11 splicing is associated with breast cancer risk in carriers of BRCA1 pathogenic variants , 2021, Human mutation.

[19]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[20]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Germline Pathogenic Variants in the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) Gene are Associated with High and Moderate Risks for Multiple Cancers , 2021, Cancer Prevention Research.

[21]  James M. Hodge,et al.  A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Narod Which Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer? , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  T. Aas,et al.  Olaparib Monotherapy as Primary Treatment in Unselected Triple Negative Breast Cancer. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  J. Schuurs-Hoeijmakers,et al.  A review on age‐related cancer risks in PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome , 2020, Clinical genetics.

[26]  E. Winer,et al.  TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  W. Muchero,et al.  Deep neural network improves the estimation of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer , 2020, Journal of Human Genetics.

[28]  H. van Attikum,et al.  Functional Characterization of PALB2 Variants of Uncertain Significance: Toward Cancer Risk and Therapy Response Prediction , 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[29]  M. Śniadecki,et al.  BARD1 and Breast Cancer: The Possibility of Creating Screening Tests and New Preventive and Therapeutic Pathways for Predisposed Women , 2020, Genes.

[30]  A. Sporle,et al.  Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  D. Steinemann,et al.  Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants , 2020, Genetics in Medicine.

[32]  K. Punie,et al.  Secondary Prevention in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Syndromes Other Than BRCA , 2020, Journal of oncology.

[33]  E. Schröck,et al.  Cancer Surveillance Guideline for individuals with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[34]  C. Witharana,et al.  Gene Mutations in Hereditary Breast Cancer- A Review , 2020, European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences.

[35]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency and PARP inhibition activity in primary triple negative breast cancer , 2020, Nature Communications.

[36]  E. Schröck,et al.  Guidelines for the Li–Fraumeni and heritable TP53-related cancer syndromes , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[37]  P. Kozłowski,et al.  BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations are associated with high susceptibility to ovarian cancer: mutation prevalence and precise risk estimates based on a pooled analysis of ~30,000 cases , 2020, Journal of Ovarian Research.

[38]  F. Saad,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  S. Piana,et al.  BRCA Detection Rate in an Italian Cohort of Luminal Early-Onset and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients without Family History: When Biology Overcomes Genealogy , 2020, Cancers.

[41]  S. Salvi,et al.  Genetic Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancers: How Many and Which Genes to Test? , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[42]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Cancer Risks Associated With Germline PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: An International Study of 524 Families. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  J. Ivanovich,et al.  Rare BRIP1 missense alleles confer risk for ovarian and breast cancer. , 2019, Cancer research.

[44]  Stefania Tommasi,et al.  Association of Genomic Domains in BRCA1 and BRCA2 with Prostate Cancer Risk and Aggressiveness. , 2019, Cancer research.

[45]  T. Koller,et al.  A systematic review of predicted pathogenic PALB2 variants: an analysis of mutational overlap between epithelial cancers , 2019, Journal of Human Genetics.

[46]  F. Couch,et al.  A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[47]  A. Venkitaraman How do mutations affecting the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause cancer susceptibility? , 2019, DNA repair.

[48]  Lea M. Starita,et al.  Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework , 2019, Genome Medicine.

[49]  Yan Liu,et al.  p53 involvement in clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. , 2019, Current opinion in hematology.

[50]  S. Pinder,et al.  Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Variants in CDH1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, BRCA1, and TP53 in Sporadic Lobular Breast Cancer , 2019, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[51]  R. Pilarski PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome: A Clinical Overview , 2019, Cancers.

[52]  A. Meindl,et al.  Germline loss-of-function variants in the BARD1 gene are associated with early-onset familial breast cancer but not ovarian cancer , 2019, Breast Cancer Research.

[53]  Nathanael D. Moore,et al.  Association of Inherited Pathogenic Variants in Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) With Susceptibility to Testicular Germ Cell Tumors , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[54]  Frederick P. Roth,et al.  MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect , 2019, Genome Biology.

[55]  Tae-Dong Jeong,et al.  Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines , 2019, Breast Cancer.

[56]  M. Porteous,et al.  Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals’ views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care , 2019, Familial Cancer.

[57]  Maria Sofia Fernandes,et al.  Clinical spectrum and pleiotropic nature of CDH1 germline mutations , 2019, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[58]  M. García-Closas,et al.  BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[59]  David G. Knowles,et al.  Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning , 2019, Cell.

[60]  Sitao Wu,et al.  Association of Breast and Ovarian Cancers With Predisposition Genes Identified by Large-Scale Sequencing , 2019, JAMA Oncology.

[61]  Kristen S Purrington,et al.  Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2018, American Journal of Human Genetics.

[62]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2018, PLoS genetics.

[63]  R. Kim,et al.  Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer , 2018, Cancers.

[64]  C. Caldas,et al.  A RAD51 assay feasible in routine tumor samples calls PARP inhibitor response beyond BRCA mutation , 2018, EMBO molecular medicine.

[65]  Hisashi Tanaka,et al.  BRCA1 ensures genome integrity by eliminating estrogen-induced pathological topoisomerase II–DNA complexes , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Y. Li,et al.  Associations between RAD51D germline mutations and breast cancer risk and survival in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancers , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[67]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Prevalence of Germline Mutations in Cancer Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[68]  Raymond M. Moore,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Risk Genes Identified by Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Testing , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[69]  Javier Santoyo-Lopez,et al.  A Dominantly Inherited 5′ UTR Variant Causing Methylation-Associated Silencing of BRCA1 as a Cause of Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[70]  Joseph D. Janizek,et al.  Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing , 2018, Nature.

[71]  B. Bonanni,et al.  Hereditary lobular breast cancer with an emphasis on E-cadherin genetic defect , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[72]  E. Topol,et al.  The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[73]  P. Pharoah,et al.  Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for ovarian cancer risk prediction in a prospective cohort study , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[74]  P. Kristel,et al.  RAD51 foci as a functional biomarker of homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitor resistance in germline BRCA-mutated breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[75]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Mainstreamed genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: first-year experience , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[76]  K. Offit,et al.  A counseling framework for moderate-penetrance colorectal cancer susceptibility genes , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[77]  G. Nalepa,et al.  Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship , 2018, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[78]  Chunlei Liu,et al.  ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[79]  James X. Sun,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[80]  L. Guerrini-Rousseau,et al.  Contribution of de novo and mosaic TP53 mutations to Li-Fraumeni syndrome , 2017, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[81]  C. Gau,et al.  Somatic TP53 variants frequently confound germline testing results , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[82]  Frank C. Day,et al.  Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling , 2017, BMC Medical Education.

[83]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[84]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Circulating Cell-Free DNA to Guide Prostate Cancer Treatment with PARP Inhibition. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[85]  Robert Huether,et al.  Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[86]  E. Ostrander,et al.  Rare, protein-truncating variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2, but not XRCC2, are associated with increased breast cancer risks , 2017, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[87]  P. Concannon,et al.  ATM, radiation, and the risk of second primary breast cancer , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[88]  Yuntao Xie,et al.  Germline Mutations in Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Large Series of Unselected Breast Cancer Patients , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[89]  W. Chung,et al.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, JAMA.

[90]  Gayle Patel,et al.  A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25‐gene panel of hereditary cancer genes , 2017, Cancer.

[91]  W. Chung,et al.  Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[92]  B. Bonanni,et al.  BRCA1/2 germline missense mutations: a systematic review , 2017, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[93]  F. Couch,et al.  Male breast cancer in a multi-gene panel testing cohort: insights and unexpected results , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[94]  T. Pal,et al.  BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2016 .

[95]  P. Rosenberg,et al.  Risks of first and subsequent cancers among TP53 mutation carriers in the National Cancer Institute Li‐Fraumeni syndrome cohort , 2016, Cancer.

[96]  J. Cuzick,et al.  The impact of a panel of 18 SNPs on breast cancer risk in women attending a UK familial screening clinic: a case–control study , 2016, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[97]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Genetic modifiers of CHEK2*1100delC associated breast cancer risk , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[98]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[99]  Dennis J. Hazelett,et al.  The OncoArray Consortium: A Network for Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Common Cancers , 2016, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[100]  T. Kipps,et al.  ATM Mutations in Cancer: Therapeutic Implications , 2016, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[101]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[102]  Jianxin Shi,et al.  Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[103]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort. , 2016, Cancer genetics.

[104]  S. Seal,et al.  Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[105]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[106]  S. Cross,et al.  No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing , 2016, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[107]  Dong Liang,et al.  BRCA2 Polymorphic Stop Codon K3326X and the Risk of Breast, Prostate, and Ovarian Cancers. , 2016, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[108]  M. Nilbert,et al.  Increased risk of male cancer and identification of a potential prostate cancer cluster region in BRCA2 , 2016, Acta oncologica.

[109]  Wei Yuan,et al.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[110]  Ping Sun,et al.  CHEK2 mutations and the risk of papillary thyroid cancer , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[111]  D. Gudbjartsson,et al.  Loss-of-function variants in ATM confer risk of gastric cancer , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[112]  L. Brooks,et al.  ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[113]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[114]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. , 2015 .

[115]  Jane E. Carpenter,et al.  Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Profiling With Common Genetic Variants , 2015, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[116]  C. Oing,et al.  Involvement of ATM in homologous recombination after end resection and RAD51 nucleofilament formation , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[117]  H. Rehm,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[118]  J. Wardle,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Population Screening for BRCA Mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish Women Compared With Family History–Based Testing , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[119]  G. Henderson,et al.  Genomic Screening of the General Adult Population: Key Concepts for Assessing Net Benefit with Systematic Evidence Reviews , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[120]  B. Tarini,et al.  Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[121]  C. Eng,et al.  Molecular and Phenotypic Abnormalities in Individuals with Germline Heterozygous PTEN Mutations and Autism , 2014, Molecular Psychiatry.

[122]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Saturation Editing of Genomic Regions by Multiplex Homology-Directed Repair , 2014, Nature.

[123]  A. Sieuwerts,et al.  Functional Ex Vivo Assay to Select Homologous Recombination–Deficient Breast Tumors for PARP Inhibitor Treatment , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[124]  A. Tutt,et al.  Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[125]  Tina Pesaran,et al.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[126]  Yuya Kobayashi,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[127]  P. Tonin,et al.  Social, ethical and legal considerations raised by the discovery and patenting of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes , 2014 .

[128]  A. Venkitaraman Cancer Suppression by the Chromosome Custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2014, Science.

[129]  J. Shendure,et al.  A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[130]  F. Couch,et al.  Functional Assays for Analysis of Variants of Uncertain Significance in BRCA2 , 2014, Human mutation.

[131]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[132]  Alison B. Hamilton,et al.  A cancer genetics toolkit improves access to genetic services through documentation and use of the family history by primary-care clinicians , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[133]  R. Eeles,et al.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[134]  A. Sézeur,et al.  CDH1 germline mutations and the hereditary diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome: a multicentre study , 2013, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[135]  I. Adzhubei,et al.  Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2 , 2013, Current protocols in human genetics.

[136]  F. Couch,et al.  A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance , 2012, Human mutation.

[137]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  A Finnish founder mutation in RAD51D: analysis in breast, ovarian, prostate, and colorectal cancer , 2012, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[138]  Diane D. Liu,et al.  Early onset HER2‐positive breast cancer is associated with germline TP53 mutations , 2012, Cancer.

[139]  Sue Healey,et al.  ENIGMA—Evidence‐based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: An international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes , 2012, Human mutation.

[140]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity is associated with a high breast cancer risk in women , 2011, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[141]  A. Jakubowska,et al.  Risk of breast cancer in women with a CHEK2 mutation with and without a family history of breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[142]  P. Oefner,et al.  Rare variants in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[143]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[144]  A. Ashworth,et al.  A Marker of Homologous Recombination Predicts Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[145]  D. Evans,et al.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[146]  A. Munkarah,et al.  Ovarian and Uterine Carcinosarcomas: A Comparative Analysis of Prognostic Variables and Survival Outcomes , 2010, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[147]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Common variations in BARD1 influence susceptibility to high-risk neuroblastoma , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[148]  S. Sommer,et al.  Beyond Li Fraumeni Syndrome: clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[149]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations , 2008, Nature.

[150]  B. Fernandez,et al.  Founder and recurrent CDH1 mutations in families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. , 2007, JAMA.

[151]  M. Olivier,et al.  The TP53 mutation, R337H, is associated with Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni-like syndromes in Brazilian families. , 2007, Cancer letters.

[152]  Nazneen Rahman,et al.  Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[153]  J. Lubiński,et al.  CHEK2 variants predispose to benign, borderline and low-grade invasive ovarian tumors. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[154]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. , 2006, Cancer research.

[155]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 mutation carriers among U.S. non-Hispanic Whites. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[156]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[157]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  CHEK2 variant I157T may be associated with increased breast cancer risk , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[158]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[159]  R. Camplejohn,et al.  p53 functional assays: detecting p53 mutations in both the germline and in sporadic tumours , 2001, Cell proliferation.

[160]  C. Woods,et al.  Novel PTEN mutations in patients with Cowden disease: absence of clear genotype–phenotype correlations , 1999, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[161]  Anne M. Bowcock,et al.  Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[162]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[163]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[164]  M. Skolnick,et al.  The incidence and gene frequency of ataxia-telangiectasia in the United States. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[165]  M.P.H. Jada G. Hamilton Ph.D.,et al.  Primary care providers’ cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda , 2016, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[166]  R. Seruca,et al.  E-cadherin alterations in hereditary disorders with emphasis on hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. , 2013, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.

[167]  Yuchen Jiao,et al.  ATM mutations in patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[168]  S. Seal,et al.  Variation of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene , 1997, Nature Genetics.