Glaucoma management in patients with penetrating keratoplasty or keratoprosthesis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Brănișteanu,et al. Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Glaucoma after Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2022, Diagnostics.
[2] Rizwan Malik,et al. Intermediate-term Visual Outcomes and Complications of Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis With and Without Glaucoma Surgery , 2022, Cornea.
[3] S. Istrate,et al. Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2022, Diagnostics.
[4] David A. Solá-Del Valle,et al. Netarsudil-associated reticular corneal epithelial edema , 2022, American journal of ophthalmology case reports.
[5] J. Shimazaki,et al. Elevated Cytokine Levels in Aqueous Humor Are Associated with Peripheral Anterior Synechiae after Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.
[6] M. Harissi-Dagher,et al. Assessment of the Role and Timing of Glaucoma Surgery in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Patients. , 2021, American journal of ophthalmology.
[7] P. Ramulu,et al. Reliability of Several Glaucoma Tests in Patients With Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis , 2021, Cornea.
[8] M. Harissi-Dagher,et al. Vitreoretinal Complications in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1. , 2021, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.
[9] C. Moreno,et al. Prevalence and risk factors to develop ocular hypertension and glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2021, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.
[10] M. Harissi-Dagher,et al. Glaucoma Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Surgery. , 2021, American journal of ophthalmology.
[11] J. Roider,et al. Ten-Year Outcome of Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery After Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2020, Journal of glaucoma.
[12] S. H. Teixeira,et al. Visual Field Characteristics of Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis Patients without Glaucoma. , 2020, Journal of glaucoma.
[13] W. Kiddee,et al. The Variations of the Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients Having Corneal Edema after Phacoemulsification. , 2020, Journal of glaucoma.
[14] M. Harissi-Dagher,et al. Cyclophotocoagulation in the Control of Glaucoma in Patients With the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1. , 2020, Cornea.
[15] Lucy Q. Shen,et al. Angle Anatomy and Glaucoma in Patients With Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Cornea.
[16] K. Mansouri,et al. Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis surgery with the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the first year. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.
[17] Lucy Q. Shen,et al. Glaucoma After Corneal Trauma or Surgery—A Rapid, Inflammatory, IOP-Independent Pathway , 2019, Cornea.
[18] Teresa C. Chen,et al. Three-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging For Glaucoma Associated With Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I and II , 2019, Journal of glaucoma.
[19] David Tabibian,et al. Contact Transscleral Cyclodiode Laser Treatment for Refractory Glaucoma After Penetrating Keratoplasty: Retrospective Long-term Outcomes , 2019, Journal of glaucoma.
[20] Lucy Q. Shen,et al. Blood Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Its Type 2 Receptor Are Elevated in Patients with Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2019, Current eye research.
[21] Jay C. Wang,et al. Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 reimplantation: multicentre study results. , 2018, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.
[22] Z. Yalniz-Akkaya,et al. Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Glaucoma Drainage Devices for Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2018, Cornea.
[23] T. Vajaranant,et al. Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage After Boston Keratoprosthesis Implantation Based on Digital Planimetric Quantification of Visual Fields and Optic Nerve Head Imaging , 2018, Cornea.
[24] Stephan Y Chiu,et al. Safety of Concurrent Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis and Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation. , 2017, Ophthalmology.
[25] Beatriz Munoz,et al. Long-term outcomes of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation: a retrospective multicenter cohort. , 2014, Ophthalmology.
[26] T. Porco,et al. Scleral intraocular pressure measurement in cadaver eyes pre- and postkeratoprosthesis implantation. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[27] Lucy Q. Shen,et al. Glaucoma Progression and Role of Glaucoma Surgery in Patients With Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2014, Cornea.
[28] J. Wilensky,et al. Agreement among Transpalpebral, Transcleral and Tactile Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Eyes with Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2013 .
[29] J. Stein,et al. Glaucoma Associated With Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2012, Cornea.
[30] M. Harissi-Dagher,et al. Prevalence, progression, and impact of glaucoma on vision after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.
[31] A. Joussen,et al. Glaucoma in penetrating keratoplasty: risk factors, management and outcome , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[32] A. Şahin,et al. Glaucoma after Penetrating Keratoplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management , 2011, Journal of ophthalmology.
[33] M. L. Salvetat,et al. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty , 2011, Eye.
[34] T. Mcmahon,et al. Special considerations for pars plana tube-shunt placement in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.
[35] R. Sihota,et al. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Opaque Grafts With Post-Penetrating Keratoplasty Glaucoma , 2008, Cornea.
[36] E. Spoerl,et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.
[37] E. Godehardt,et al. The influence of glaucoma history on graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[38] D. Ritterband,et al. Pars plana tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with coexisting glaucoma and corneal disease. , 2001, Ophthalmology.
[39] J. M. Taylor,et al. Long-term results of eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage tube implant. , 2001, Ophthalmology.
[40] U. Ticho,et al. Mitomycin-C in combined or two-stage procedure trabeculectomy followed by penetrating keratoplasty. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.
[41] J. Schuman,et al. Comparison of mitomycin C trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage device implantation, and laser neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of intractable glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1998, Ophthalmology.
[42] P. Netland,et al. Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis. , 1998, Ophthalmology.
[43] E. Cohen,et al. Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.
[44] L. Ficker,et al. Risk Factors for the Development of Postkeratoplasty Glaucoma , 1992, Cornea.
[45] G. Foulks. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. , 1987, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).
[46] S. I. Brown,et al. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. , 1981, American journal of ophthalmology.
[47] T. Zimmerman,et al. The effect of suture depth on outflow facility in penetrating keratoplasty. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.