Robust Bearing Estimation for Three-component Stations

Abstract — A robust bearing estimation process for 3-component stations has been developed and explored. The method, called SEEC for Search, Estimate, Evaluate and Correct, intelligently exploits the inherent information in the arrival at every step of the process to achieve near-optimal results. In particular, the approach uses a consistent framework to define the optimal time-frequency windows on which to make estimates, to make the bearing estimates themselves, to construct metrics helpful in choosing the better estimates or admitting that the bearing is immeasurable, and finally to apply bias corrections when calibration information is available to yield a single final estimate. The algorithm was applied to a small but challenging set of events in a seismically active region. It demonstrated remarkable utility by providing better estimates and insights than previously available. Various monitoring implications are noted from these findings.

[1]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[2]  K. Koch,et al.  Investigation of azimuth residuals observed at stations of the GSETT-3 Alpha network , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Eric P. Chael,et al.  Optimal backazimuth estimation for three-component recordings of regional seismic events , 1991 .

[4]  E. A. Flinn Signal analysis using rectilinearity and direction of particle motion , 1965 .

[5]  R. Roberts,et al.  Real-time event detection, phase identification and source location estimation using single station three-component seismic data , 1989 .

[6]  J. Oliver,et al.  Structure of the Laramide Wind River Uplift, Wyoming, from Cocorp deep reflection data and from gravity data , 1979 .

[7]  Jonathan M. Lilly,et al.  Multiwavelet spectral and polarization analyses of seismic records , 1995 .

[8]  B. Law,et al.  Geology of tight gas reservoirs in the Pinedale Anticline area, Wyoming, and at the Multiwell Experiment site, Colorado , 1989 .

[9]  N. Magotra,et al.  Seismic event detection and source location using single-station (three-component) data , 1987 .

[10]  A. Jurkevics Polarization analysis of three-component array data , 1988 .

[11]  John E. Vidale,et al.  Complex polarization analysis of particle motion , 1986 .

[12]  Lorie K. Bear,et al.  Multi-wavelet analysis of three-component seismic arrays: Application to measure effective anisotropy at Piñon Flats, California , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Wavefield decomposition using ML-probabilities in modelling single-site 3-component records , 1988 .