To tag or not to tag?

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide a quantitative analysis of the extent to which folksonomies replicate the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) to see if folksonomies would successfully complement cataloger‐supplied subject headings in library catalogs.Design/methodology/approach – The paper compares social tags and LC subject headings for ten books from various library‐related applications including next generation OPACs and LibraryThing by ranking tags and subject headings using scales modified from research by Golder and Huberman, Voorbij, and Kipp.Findings – Social tagging does indeed augment LCSH by providing additional access to resources.Research limitations/implications – Several of our applications lacked tags for the books we chose in our study. Tags are primarily taken from LibraryThing.Practical implications – A hybrid catalog combining both LCSH and a folksonomy would result in richer metadata and be stronger than the sum of its parts, giving patrons the best of both...

[1]  Henk J. Voorbij.  Title keywords and subject descriptors: a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences , 1998, J. Documentation.

[2]  Tom Steele.  The new cooperative cataloging , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[3]  Justine Brown.  Tag! You're It!. , 2007 .

[4]  Paul Miller,et al.  Metadata for the Masses , 1996 .

[5]  Louise F. Spiteri,et al.  The Use of Folksonomies in Public Library Catalogues , 2006 .

[6]  Heather Lea Moulaison,et al.  Collaborative and Social Tagging Networks , 2008 .

[7]  Louise F. Spiteri,et al.  The structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalog , 2007 .

[8]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  George Macgregor,et al.  Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool , 2006 .

[10]  Alexandra Chappell,et al.  LibraryThing for libraries at Claremont , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[11]  Margaret E. I. Kipp,et al.  Patterns and Inconsistencies in Collaborative Tagging Systems: An Examination of Tagging Practices , 2007, ASIST.

[12]  P. Jason Morrison.  Folksonomies: Why are they tagging, and why do we want them to? , 2008 .

[13]  Jay Bhatt,et al.  Science and Technology Libraries Partnering with Knovel , 2006 .

[14]  Jakob Voß,et al.  Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing? , 2007, ArXiv.

[15]  Tony Hammond,et al.  Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Overview , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[16]  Margaret E. I. Kipp,et al.  Complementary or Discrete Contexts in Online Indexing : A Comparison of User, Creator, and Intermediary Keywords , 2013 .

[17]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Folksonomies: Tidying Up Tags? , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[18]  Jakob Voß,et al.  Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way , 2006, ArXiv.

[19]  L. H. Mendes,et al.  Subjecting the catalog to tagging , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[20]  Alireza Noruzi,et al.  Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary? , 2007, Webology.

[21]  Laura Gordon-Murnane.  Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and web 2.0 tools , 2006 .

[22]  Krystyna K. Matusiak.  Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections , 2006, OCLC Syst. Serv..