Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files.

The aim of this study was to investigate the cutting ability of sonic files. A model system was developed and the following variables evaluated: file type. Heliosonic or Shaper; file length, 21 or 29 mm; power, air inlet ring opening of half or fully open; stroke length, 2 or 4 mm; stroke rate, one or two cycles per second; and load 50 or 100 g. A 2(6) full-factorial analysis with two replications into the effect of the above variables on the cutting ability of the MM1500 sonic instrument was performed. A new size 25 file was used for each cut, together with water irrigation, and the substrate used was 1-mm thick sections of bovine bone. The differences between the variables were significant (ANOVA, P < 0.001). However, examination of the F-values showed that the most significant variable to affect cutting was load, followed by power, file type, stroke length and stroke rate, with the least significant variable being file length. The most significant interaction was between rate and length of stroke. An increase in stroke rate from one to two cycles per second at a stroke length of 2 mm produced an increase in cutting for both the Heliosonic and Shaper files. However, at the longer stroke length of 4 mm, the same increase in rate resulted in a decrease in cutting for the Shaper files. Therefore, it is suggested that operators should press the file against the canal wall and move it slowly to maximise cutting.

[1]  A. Walmsley,et al.  An in vitro investigation into the cutting ability of ultrasonic K files. , 1994, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[2]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Effect of air inlet ring opening on sonic handpiece performance. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  P J Lumley,et al.  A model system for evaluating filing technique. , 1994, International endodontic journal.

[4]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Variations in stroke rate and loading using hand sonic or ultrasonic instrumentation. , 1993, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[5]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  Dentine-removing characteristics of K-files energized by the Piezon-Endo. , 1992, International endodontic journal.

[6]  A. Woda,et al.  An evaluation of four methods of root canal preparation using 14C urea. , 1991, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  Dentine-removing characteristics of an ultrasonically energized K-file. , 1989, International endodontic journal.

[8]  P M Dummer,et al.  Shaping of simulated root canals in resin blocks using files activated by a sonic handpiece. , 1989, International endodontic journal.

[9]  L. Miserendino,et al.  Cutting efficiency of endodontic hand instruments. Part 4. Comparison of hybrid and traditional instrument designs. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  L. Miserendino,et al.  Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part III. Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic instrument systems. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  L. Miserendino,et al.  Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part II: Analysis of tip design. , 1986, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  L. Miserendino,et al.  Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part 1: a quantitative comparison of the tip and fluted regions. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  R. Craig,et al.  Cutting ability of square versus rhombus cross-sectional endodontic files. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  H. Gerstein,et al.  A study of the cutting efficiency of seven brands of endodontic files in linear motion. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Cutting ability of K type endodontic files. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  J. Moser,et al.  Flute design of endodontic instruments: its influence on cutting efficiency. , 1982, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  J. Moser,et al.  A method to determine the cutting efficiency of root canal instruments in rotary motion. , 1980, Journal of endodontics.