Proposal of AISC-compliant seismic design criteria for ductile partially-restrained end-plate bolted joints

Abstract AISC358–16 provides seismic pre-qualification rules and design procedures for fully restrained extended stiffened end-plate bolted connections, while the cases of partially restrained connections are generally not considered for seismic applications. However, provided that the failure of both bolts and the welds is prevented, partially restrained joints may exhibit satisfactory ductile behavior, also accommodating interstory drift rotation larger than 0.04 rad. This performance can be achieved if the resistance of brittle zones of the connections is greater than the ultimate resistance of the ductile components, as experimentally proved in some recent European research projects. Therefore, the study presented in this article aims at proposing design rules for partially restrained connections in order to meet the prequalification limits given by AISC358–16. To achieve this purpose, a comprehensive parametric study based on finite element analysis (FEAs) was carried out. The numerical results show that the proposed AISC-compliant procedure can guarantee satisfactory performance of partially restrained connections, which exhibit good ductility and dissipation capacity.

[1]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Response of partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections under cyclic loads , 2014 .

[2]  Sanjib Kumar Acharyya,et al.  Material characterization of SS 316 in low-cycle fatigue loading , 2010 .

[3]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Full strength extended stiffened end-plate joints: AISC vs recent European design criteria , 2018 .

[4]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic behaviour of semi-rigid steel frames , 1994 .

[5]  Marwan N. Nader,et al.  Shaking Table Tests of Rigid, Semirigid, and Flexible Steel Frames , 1996 .

[6]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Design of full-strength full-ductility extended end-plate beam-to-column joints , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[7]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  The influence of rib stiffeners on the response of extended end-plate joints , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[8]  Theodore V. Galambos,et al.  Updating Standard Shape Material Properties Database for Design and Reliability , 2003 .

[9]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Seismic design of extended stiffened end-plate joints in the framework of Eurocodes , 2017 .

[10]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1995 .

[11]  H. Dell,et al.  A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions , 2004 .

[12]  Brian Uy,et al.  System reliability evaluation of steel frames with semi-rigid connections , 2016 .

[13]  Experimental analysis and mechanical modeling of T-stubs with four bolts per row , 2014 .

[14]  Jean-Pierre Jaspart General report: session on connections , 2000 .

[15]  Bungale S. Taranath,et al.  Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-10 , 2016 .

[16]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Seismic response of MRFs with partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections through FE analyses , 2015 .

[17]  James A. Swanson,et al.  BOLTED STEEL CONNECTIONS: TESTS ON T-STUB COMPONENTS , 2000 .

[18]  Gang Shi,et al.  Behaviour of end-plate moment connections under earthquake loading , 2007 .

[19]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Simplified criteria for finite element modelling of European preloadable bolts , 2017 .

[20]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  An advanced analysis method for three-dimensional steel frames with semi-rigid connections , 2014 .

[21]  Jean-Pierre Jaspart,et al.  Economy Studies of Steel Building Frames with Semi-Rigid Joints , 1998 .

[22]  Adrian Ciutina,et al.  CYCLIC TESTS OF DOUBLE-SIDED BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS , 2001 .

[23]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures , 2018, Design of Structural Elements.

[24]  Daniel Grecea,et al.  Performance criteria for MR steel frames in seismic zones , 2004 .

[25]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake , 1996 .

[26]  Aldina Santiago,et al.  Numerical assessment of T-stub component subjected to impact loading , 2013 .

[27]  Ronald O. Hamburger,et al.  Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05 , 2006 .

[28]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Advanced finite element modeling of bolted T-stub connection components , 2002 .

[29]  Bing Guo,et al.  Experimental Behavior of Stiffened and Unstiffened End-Plate Connections under Cyclic Loading , 2006 .