Does Humanity Matter? Analyzing the Importance of Social Cues and Perceived Agency of a Computer System for the Emergence of Social Reactions during Human-Computer Interaction

Empirical studies have repeatedly shown that autonomous artificial entities elicit social behavior on the part of the human interlocutor. Various theoretical approaches have tried to explain this phenomenon. The agency assumption states that the social influence of human interaction partners (represented by avatars) will always be higher than the influence of artificial entities (represented by embodied conversational agents). Conversely, the Ethopoeia concept predicts that automatic social reactions are triggered by situations as soon as they include social cues. Both theories have been challenged in a 2 × 2 between subjects design with two levels of agency (low: agent, high: avatar) and two interfaces with different degrees of social cues (low: textchat, high: virtual human). The results show that participants in the virtual human condition reported a stronger sense ofmutual awareness, imputed more positive characteristics, and allocated more attention to the virtual human than participants in the text chat conditions. Only one result supports the agency assumption; participants who believed to interact with a human reported a stronger feeling of social presence than participants who believed to interact with an artificial entity. It is discussed to what extent these results support the social cue assumption made in the Ethopoeia approach.

[1]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Virtual Rapport , 2006, IVA.

[2]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Cooperating with life-like interface agents , 1999 .

[3]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Ning Wang,et al.  Can Virtual Humans Be More Engaging Than Real Ones? , 2007, HCI.

[6]  Byron Reeves,et al.  The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces , 2000, CHI.

[7]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[8]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[9]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[10]  E. Aharoni,et al.  Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere lables shape interactions , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates , 1990 .

[12]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[15]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Human-computer interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis , 1982 .

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  M. Black.  Avatars , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Richard L. Street,et al.  Signal Delay Effects on Rapport in Telepsychiatry , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Philipp Mayring.  Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung : eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken , 1999 .

[20]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[21]  E. Langer,et al.  The Construct of Mindfulness , 2000 .

[22]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[24]  Jennifer L. Gregg,et al.  The Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence : Pilot Test of the Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity , 2001 .

[25]  Philipp Mayring.  Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung , 2006 .

[26]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[27]  Ning Wang,et al.  Creating Rapport with Virtual Agents , 2007, IVA.

[28]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? , 2009, IVA.

[31]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Towards Context-Based Visual Feedback Recognition for Embodied Agents , 2005 .

[33]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Computer Animated Movement and Person Perception: Methodological Advances in Nonverbal Behavior Research , 2001 .

[34]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[35]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[36]  C. Nass,et al.  Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[37]  E. Langer,et al.  Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[39]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Brent Rossen,et al.  Virtual Humans Elicit Skin-Tone Bias Consistent with Real-World Skin-Tone Biases , 2008, IVA.

[41]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.