Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography

Screening mammography continues to play a key role in the early diagnosis of non‐palpable breast cancer. Approximately 5% of patients will have lesions on their mammograms that appear neither clearly benign nor malignant. The proper management of these patients is not well defined. In this study, the mammograms of 64 women who underwent breast biopsy were reviewed. After the initial review, the mammograms were reevaluated using a personal computer driven digital conversion and enhancement system. The majority of indeterminate lesions were assigned a determinate diagnosis by enhancing the areas of abnormality through enlargement, contrast adjustment, and brightness adjustment. The radiologists were able to maintain baseline sensitivity and specificity throughout this process. In contrast, enhancement of lesions initially assigned a diagnosis of characteristically benign or malignant demonstrated no advantage over plain film mammography. These findings suggest a role for the selective use of digital mammography and enhancement techniques. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S Ciatto,et al.  Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. , 1987, Radiology.

[2]  J D Iglehart,et al.  Nonpalpable Breast Lesions At Biopsy: A Detailed Analysis of Radiographie Features , 1988, Annals of surgery.

[3]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of mammographic clustered calcifications. , 1989, Clinical radiology.

[4]  M A Helvie,et al.  Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. , 1991, Radiology.

[5]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[6]  E Claridge,et al.  Extraction of quantitative blur measures for circumscribed lesions in mammograms. , 1991, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[7]  P. D. de Neef,et al.  Experience with indeterminate mammograms. , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[8]  F. Shtern Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. , 1992, Radiology.

[9]  H Iguchi,et al.  Clinical evaluation of assistant diagnostic system for mammograms using the auto-analyzing method. , 1992, Radiation medicine.

[10]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms. , 1992, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[11]  E. Christensen,et al.  Automatic screening of plain film mammography. , 1992, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[12]  W F Bischof,et al.  Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.